arXiv AI

Personalizing LLM Agent Memory Using Biometrics

The paper introduces Bio-Memory, a biometric-aware memory architecture for large language model agents that conditions memory retrieval on both semantic similarity and biometric matching. By augmenting each memory note with a biometric embedding, Bio-Memory filters retrieval candidates based on identity before ranking them semantically. Experiments on a 10-user shared-agent setting across face and palmprint benchmarks show significant improvements in distinguishing owner from non-owner queries, with up to a 27.29% F1 gain on CALFW and 25.75% on MS_Blue.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 14

AIM: A Privacy-Aware Interoperable Memory Framework for Multi-Agent Multi-User LLM Systems

The paper introduces AIM, a privacy‑aware memory framework that lets multi‑agent, multi‑user large language models manage both private and shared memory. AIM classifies data as private (user‑specific) or public (shared) and enforces index‑level access controls to protect sensitive information while enabling shared knowledge to improve coordination. The authors also present MUMBench, a new dataset for evaluating memory operations in multi‑user settings, and report high accuracy metrics for AIM on this benchmark.

By Zachary Johnson, Nigel Boachie Kumankumah, Somya Chatterjee, Tejas Sathyamurthi, Min Chen, Xinyi Alice Li, Xiao Wang, Emily Morgan Gelchie, Jessica Lin, Sadid A. Hasan, Sulaiman Vesal
arXiv AI
Sep 11

Kernel-Managed Shared Memory for System-Wide Personalization

The paper introduces kernel‑managed shared memory, a system‑level abstraction that lets specialized agents write structured, tagged memories while the agent‑system kernel controls retrieval, privacy, and prompt injection. Implemented on AIOS, this design outperforms unmanaged external memory, standard retrieval‑augmented injection, and full context concatenation across GPT‑4o, Llama‑3.1:8B, and Qwen‑2.5:7B, improving personalization scores by 2.4‑4.0 points on a 5‑point scale and reducing latency and token usage by 15‑61%. The results show that centralizing memory management in the kernel delivers most personalization benefits at a fraction of the cost.

By Ryan Lum, Yongfeng Zhang
arXiv AI
Oct 5

DyadMem: A Long-Term Memory Benchmark of How Agents Work with Users

DyadMem introduces a new benchmark for evaluating how long‑term agents remember user‑specific relational information, called User‑conditioned Relational Agent Memory (URAM). The dataset contains 3,065 episodes, 50,961 sessions, and 61,210 QA pairs, with detailed annotations for memory capture, update, and recall across multi‑session trajectories. Experiments on 20 models show strong performance in a gold‑memory setting but a significant drop in full‑pipeline QA, highlighting gaps in current LLM memory capabilities.

By Yifei Tao, Xinyu Zhong, Henry Hengyuan Zhao, Fanyi Wang, Tengda Guo, Wentao Qiu, Ying Wang, Liujian Tang
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 11

Evaluating Memory Structure in LLM Agents

The paper introduces StructMemEval, a benchmark designed to assess how well large language model (LLM) agents can organize their long‑term memory rather than merely recall facts. It compiles tasks that humans typically solve by structuring knowledge—such as transaction ledgers, to‑do lists, and trees—and evaluates agents on these. Experiments show that simple retrieval‑augmented LLMs struggle with such organization tasks, while memory‑augmented agents perform better when explicitly prompted to structure their memory, yet many modern LLMs still fail to recognize memory structures without prompting.

By Alina Shutova, Alexandra Olenina, Ivan Vinogradov, Anton Sinitsin
arXiv AI
Jun 30

Mandol: An Agglomerative Agent Memory System for Long-Term Conversations

arXiv:2606. 29778v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term conversational agents need to remember and query cross-session, multi-typed information with complex correlations.

By Yuhan Zhang (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Zhiyuan Guo (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Ziheng Zeng (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Wei Wang (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Wentao Wu (Microsoft Research), Lijie Xu (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences)