The paper introduces AMA, a framework that uses multiple agents—Constructor, Retriever, Judge, and Refresher—to manage memory for large language model agents. AMA’s hierarchical memory design dynamically adjusts retrieval granularity to match task complexity, while the Judge and Refresher ensure relevance, consistency, and timely updates. Experiments on long-context benchmarks show AMA outperforms existing baselines and cuts token usage by about 80% compared to full-context approaches.
By Weiquan Huang, Zixuan Wang, Hehai Lin, Sudong Wang, Bo Xu, Qian Li, Beier Zhu, Linyi Yang, Chengwei Qin
arXiv:2606. 29778v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-term conversational agents need to remember and query cross-session, multi-typed information with complex correlations.
By Yuhan Zhang (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Zhiyuan Guo (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Ziheng Zeng (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Wei Wang (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Wentao Wu (Microsoft Research), Lijie Xu (Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
arXiv:2606. 00610v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become an essential method for mitigating hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) by leveraging external knowledge.
By Chuanjie Wu, Zhishang Xiang, Yunbo Tang, Zerui Chen, Qinggang Zhang, Jinsong Su
arXiv:2606. 06036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Despite recent progress, LLM agents still struggle with reasoning over long interaction histories.
By Shuo Ji, Yibo Li, Bryan Hooi
arXiv:2606. 05761v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Persistent AI assistants, such as OpenClaw, accumulate large collections of related memories over long-term interactions.
By Wenxuan Wang, Haoyu Sun, Fukuan Hou, Mingyang Song, Weinan Zhang, Yu Cheng, Yang Yang
arXiv:2605. 18421v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents mainly evaluate reasoning, planning, and execution.
By Yuyao Wang, Zhongjian Zhang, Mo Chi, Kaichi Yu, Yuhan Li, Miao Peng, Bing Tong, Chen Zhang, Yan Zhou, Jia Li
arXiv:2607. 13591v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks.
By Eric Hanchen Jiang, Zhi Zhang, Yuchen Wu, Levina Li, Dong Liu, Xiao Liang, Rui Sun, Yubei Li, Edward Sun, Haozheng Luo, Zhaolu Kang, Aylin Caliskan, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu
arXiv:2507. 05257v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent benchmarks for Large Language Model (LLM) agents primarily focus on evaluating reasoning, planning, and execution capabilities, while another critical component-memory, encompassing how agents memorize, update, and retrieve long-term information-is under-evaluated due to the lack of benchmarks.
By Yuanzhe Hu, Yu Wang, Julian McAuley
Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly rely on external memory systems to accumulate experience across tasks. Yet nearly all existing approaches, from graph-structured memories to reflective insight stores, access memory through fixed, hand-designed heuristics.
arXiv:2604. 27707v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Current agentic memory systems (vector stores, retrieval-augmented generation, scratchpads, and context-window management) do not implement memory: they implement lookup.
By Binyan Xu, Xilin Dai, Kehuan Zhang
arXiv:2607. 22562v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Managing long-context dependencies remains a primary bottleneck in LLM agents, as redundant and irrelevant information can degrade multi-step reasoning.
By Ning Yang, Siqi Li, Miaoxin Shen, Yuan Zhou, Meng Zhang, Tong Li, Haijun Zhang
arXiv:2606. 06787v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) show promise as tool-using agents but remain limited in long-horizon tasks that require remembering, organizing, and reusing knowledge.
By Runzhe Wang, Huilin Lu, Shengjie Liu, Li Dong, Jason Zhu