arXiv AI

TreasuryQA Bench: Can AI Agents Work an Archive of Scanned Financial Records?

TreasuryQA Bench is a new benchmark that tests AI agents on real-world tasks involving searching, reading, and extracting exact figures from scanned U.S. Treasury PDFs stored on a shared drive. The benchmark presents 70 questions over 1,435 scanned documents, requiring agents to locate the relevant file via Dropbox’s Model Context Protocol, OCR the necessary pages, and return a precise numeric answer. Results from ten agents show a wide performance gap, with the best agent solving 64.8% of tasks and the worst only 16.7%, and scan quality is shown to significantly impact success rates.

arXiv AI
Oct 12

Locate, Judge, Read: Role-Specialized Tool Agents over a Knowledge-Point Index for Open-Domain Multimodal Document QA

KnowForge is a modular pipeline for open‑domain multimodal document question answering that separates retrieval, judging, and reading into distinct agents. It uses a hybrid‑retrieval knowledge‑point index, a Locator agent for searching, a Bridge Judge to enforce a second hop, a Deep Reader that handles text, images, and tables, and a synthesizer with format checking. On the M3DocVQA benchmark it achieves an F1 of 47.5, outperforming prior systems by 11 points, and shows strong gains on MultiHop‑RAG and MMLongBench‑Doc as well.

By Wenlin Lin, Fanzhe Wei
arXiv AI
Oct 23

CompLit: Scientific Literature Search Benchmarks Must Cover Implicit, Cumulative, and Unmet Needs

CompLit is a new literature search benchmark covering all eight arXiv domains, designed to evaluate agents on three diagnostic settings: implicit, cumulative, and unmet needs. The benchmark shows that top agents like Codex and Claude Code perform well on standard queries (86‑87%) but drop to 66‑68% on implicit queries, lose additional accuracy when requirements accumulate, and abstain on up to 53% of unmet queries. The study finds that agents often locate the correct or near‑correct paper but misjudge it, indicating a need for more reliable search capabilities.

By Dayoon Ko, Jihyuk Kim, Soyeong Jeong, Young-jun Lee, Dahyun Lee, Juyeon Kim, Gunhee Kim, Moontae Lee, Kyungjae Lee
arXiv AI
Sep 10

AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents

AtomCite is an agentic framework that verifies and corrects page‑level citations in multi‑page documents by parsing answers into claims, checking each claim against the cited page image, and applying a deterministic repair policy. The authors introduce DocCite, the first benchmark for this task, built on MP‑DocVQA and DUDE, containing 928 injected instances and 1,909 verified natural errors. Across Gemini, Claude, and GPT models, AtomCite achieves about 93% verification accuracy and improves citation precision from 34% to 87‑90%, while also enhancing hallucination detection in open‑source models.

By Chen Qian, Yimeng Wang, Yu Chen, Lingfei Wu, Andreas Stathopoulos
arXiv AI
Aug 19

StagedWorkspace: A Versioned Workspace for Knowledge-Work Agents

StagedWorkspace is a versioned workspace designed for knowledge‑work AI agents, ensuring that every parsed view, native file edit, and review diff is explicitly tied to a specific version of the workspace state. By binding parsed records and review diffs to content hashes of native files, the system improves performance on tasks such as OfficeQA and APEX‑Agents, achieving higher pass rates and rubric scores compared to single‑view approaches. The study demonstrates that providing dual parsed/native access and visible diffs enhances agent performance, highlighting workspace state as a key experimental variable for future benchmarks.

By Yining Hua, Hongbin Na, Yifan Zhou, Akshay Kalose, Cyrus Ayubcha, Levi Lian