arXiv:2601. 19618v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Differential privacy protects the patients whose images train medical imaging models, but it lowers diagnostic accuracy, and the initialization is the strongest known remedy.
By Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Mina Farajiamiri, Mahshad Lotfinia, Behrus Hinrichs-Puladi, Jonas Bienzeisler, Mohamed Alhaskir, Mirabela Rusu, Christiane Kuhl, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn
arXiv:2609.26623v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Diffusion-based synthetic data generation offers a promising route for sharing medical imaging data without releasing sensitive patient records. Howeve...
By Mischa Dombrowski, Bernhard Kainz
The paper demonstrates that publicly available clinical machine learning models, such as logistic regression (LR), pose significant privacy risks because attackers can recover model parameters and identify training cohorts through various membership inference attacks. The authors show that even small cohorts can be reliably identified and that common practices like cross-validation can worsen the risk. To mitigate this, they propose a quantum-inspired defense that tensorizes discretized models into tensor trains (TTs), which obfuscates parameters, preserves accuracy, and maintains interpretability while providing black‑box protection comparable to Differential Privacy.
By Jos\'e Ram\'on Pareja Monturiol, Juliette Sinnott, Roger G. Melko, Mohammad Kohandel
arXiv:2610.27470v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Federated learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning paradigm that reduces transmission costs, mitigates cross-border data sharing restrictions,...
By Md Morshedul Islam, Hossain Shahriar, Alfredo Cuzzocrea
The paper introduces a lightweight screening tool that evaluates individual patient vulnerability to membership inference attacks across thousands of medical AI models. By measuring attack scores for each patient, the authors found that certain records consistently rank high in risk regardless of training settings, and that stronger weight decay can reduce overall exposure but not the identity of the most at‑risk patients. The tool uses four small models to flag high‑risk patients before a production model is trained, aiming to integrate privacy assessment into clinical AI data preparation.
By Konstantinos Vrettos, Eleftherios Tzanis, Haridimos Kondylakis, Evangelia E. Vassalou, Florence X. Doo, Michail E. Klontzas
arXiv:2603. 04113v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Demographic attributes can be predicted from medical images, raising concerns about bias in clinical AI systems.
By Mehmet Yigit Avci (and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative), Akshit Achara (and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative), Andrew King (and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative), Jorge Cardoso (and for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative)
arXiv:2607. 08867v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Cloud-based deep learning enables large-scale medical image analysis but raises significant privacy concerns when sensitive patient images are outsourced for model development.
By Jason Rojas, Jiajie He, Yash Patel, Yuechun Gu, Zeyun Yu, Keke Chen
The paper introduces Differential Privacy Representation Geometry for Medical Imaging (DP‑RGMI), a framework that interprets differential privacy as a structured transformation of representation space. DP‑RGMI decomposes performance loss into encoder geometry—measured by representation displacement and spectral effective dimension—and task‑head utilization, quantified by the gap between linear‑probe and end‑to‑end utility. Across 594,000 chest X‑ray images from four datasets, the study finds that differential privacy consistently creates a utilization gap even when linear separability remains, while displacement and spectral dimension vary non‑monotonically with initialization and dataset, indicating that privacy alters representation anisotropy rather than uniformly collapsing features.
By Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Marziyeh Mohammadi, Sven Nebelung, Daniel Truhn
The paper compares four audit methods for assessing identity‑level differential privacy in pre‑trained, black‑box face generators. Each method—GaussMech, KDE‑LR, MMD‑TV, and ROC‑HT—has distinct assumptions, hyperparameters, and finite‑sample limitations, and they produce markedly different epsilon estimates when applied to FaceFusion and InstantID. The study finds that all methods reveal significant identity distinguishability, but none can be reliably ranked in this high‑distinguishability regime, suggesting that future work should evaluate them on partially private mechanisms.
By Arman Zareian Jahromi, Vishnu Bondalakunta, Mohammad Akbar Bin Shah, Naimul Haque, Shuangqing Wei, George T. Amariucai
DeepSSIM++ is a self‑supervised similarity metric designed to audit memorization in medical generative models at scale. It aggregates multi‑scale features and uses anatomy‑preserving augmentations to create an embedding space where cosine similarity approximates SSIM, removing the need for exact pixel‑level registration. Compared to existing baselines, DeepSSIM++ improves Macro F1 by 33–46 percentage points and speeds up large‑scale similarity computation by several orders of magnitude.
By Antonio Scardace, Francesco Guarnera, Sebastiano Battiato, Daniele Rav\`i
arXiv:2603. 10937v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The use of synthetic data has become increasingly popular as a privacy-preserving alternative to sharing real datasets, especially in sensitive domains such as healthcare, finance, and demography.
By Rajdeep Pathak, Amit Basak, Sayantee Jana
arXiv:2608. 10295v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Frozen foundation-model (FM) embeddings are increasingly used as off-the-shelf brain-MRI representations, on the assumption that they capture anatomy.
By Saman Rahbar