Hugging Face Trending Papers

Co-Occurrence Priors Override Visual Spatial Evidence: Understanding False Alarms in Vision-Language Models for Construction Struck-By Hazard Detection

arXiv Machine Learning
Oct 16

BD-HazardVLM: Probing Vision-Language Models for Latent Defensive-Driving Hazards in Bangladesh Road Scenes

BD-HazardVLM is a diagnostic benchmark of 500 Bangladesh road-scene images designed to probe vision‑language models’ defensive‑driving reasoning in weakly structured Global South traffic. The benchmark includes annotations for hazard presence, category, risk timing, severity, defensive actions, visible evidence, and bias traps, and evaluates models such as Qwen2.5‑VL‑7B, InternVL3‑8B, and MiniCPM‑V‑4.6. Results show high binary hazard‑presence accuracy but poor fine‑grained reasoning, with category accuracy below 40 %, risk‑timing accuracy under 13 %, and defensive‑action matching under 2 %. whyItMatters":"The study demonstrates that coarse hazard recognition does not guarantee reliable fine‑grained defensive‑driving reasoning, highlighting the need for geographically diverse safety evaluation of vision‑language models."

By Abdullah Al Maruf, Md. Sajedul Islam, Tanmoy Mridha, Irfan Hossain Bhuiyan
arXiv AI
Oct 16

Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields: Evidence-Grounded Selective Safety for Vision-Language Models

The paper introduces Counterfactual Neighborhood Risk Fields (CNRF), an evidence‑grounded framework that improves safety for vision‑language models (VLMs). CNRF builds context‑matched benign‑harmful counterfactual pairs, uses their representation differences to define risk directions, and separates neighborhood support from risk estimation. This approach allows selective intervention rather than blanket rejection, achieving high macro defense success rates across multiple VLMs while preserving benign‑task utility.

By Tianshi Wang, Jingsong Wang, Fengling Li, Jingjing Li, Xin Li, Lei Zhu
arXiv Computer Vision
Oct 9

FearCaut-Qwen: Affective Steering in a Vision-Language Model Shifts the Decision Criterion for Hazard Assessment

The paper investigates why vision‑language models (VLMs) often miss hazards, attributing this to an overly conservative decision criterion rather than poor perception. By identifying and steering an affective ‘fear’ circuit within the model, the authors shift the decision threshold, dramatically increasing hazard recall from 27.0 % to 75.7 % without retraining. The study demonstrates that affect‑based inference-time manipulation can correct VLM decision biases in practical applications.

By Xiaoshan Zhou
arXiv AI
Aug 12

Evidence-Grounded Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning and Evaluation Benchmark in Complex Urban Scenes

arXiv:2608. 10954v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance in benign scenarios, their cognitive reliability deteriorates significantly in complex scenes under adverse conditions.

By Zhaoyang Wei, Bowen Jiang, Xumeng Han, Jiashu Li, Xuehui Yu, Yuling Liu, Guorong Li, Zhenjun Han, Jianbin Jiao
arXiv AI
Sep 1

Evidence-Grounded Trustworthy Multimodal Reasoning and Evaluation Benchmark in Complex Urban Scenes

arXiv:2506.09557v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance in benign scenarios, their cognitive reliability deteriorat...

By Zhaoyang Wei, Bowen Jiang, Xumeng Han, Jiashu Li, Xuehui Yu, Yuling Liu, Guorong Li, Zhenjun Han, Jianbin Jiao