arXiv:2609.01526v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Scientific agents must learn not only how to reason, but also what to believe. However, existing LLM agents typically express scientific hypotheses in...
By Qing Zhao, Haowei Li, Weijian Deng, Pengxu Wei, Liang Lin
arXiv:2610.00675v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Evolutionary approaches to LLM-driven discovery often generate new programs from a small set of selected ancestors. This keeps contexts manageable bu...
By Bo Yuan, Wenqian Ye, Zelin Zhao, Lama Moukheiber, Henry Kautz, Aidong Zhang, Yongxin Chen
AutoResearch is a two‑stage autonomous research system that links Idea Generation with Idea Execution. In the generation phase it blends new research signals with existing domain knowledge, identifies transferable mechanistic insights, and produces grounded, testable research plans through multi‑model generation and cross‑review. The execution phase then decomposes these plans into experiments, iteratively implements and diagnoses them, and uses independent evidence‑based review to accept or revise conclusions, thereby turning ideas into measurable progress while minimizing hallucinations.
By Yiming Ren, Xiang Liu, Qumeng Sun, Xiao Zhang, Jiahao Li, Haoyang Zhang, Junjie Wang
arXiv:2607. 07847v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: As large language models (LLMs) become increasingly capable, the next question is how can we enable models to continually learn?
By Anne Harrington, Nayan Saxena, Michael Murphy, Anastasia Borovykh, Zeyu Yun, Sridhar Kamath, Ara Eindra Kyi, Trevor Darrell, Jitendra Malik, Yutong Bai
The paper introduces ConflictGuide, a method that enhances LLM-based AutoResearch by incorporating feedback on competing behaviors during model code editing. By first exploring with scalar task performance and then using probes to measure and alleviate conflicts, ConflictGuide increases the proportion of edits that improve multiple behaviors and sustains progress beyond scalar-only plateaus. Experiments across five model families show reductions in task and conflict-related errors by up to 28% and 14% compared to scalar-only AutoResearch.
By Binqian Xu, Qiran Zou, Xiangbo Shu, Dianbo Liu
arXiv:2603. 12658v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Continual learning (CL) has emerged as a pivotal paradigm to enable large language models (LLMs) to dynamically adapt to evolving knowledge and sequential tasks while mitigating catastrophic forgetting, a critical limitation of the static pre-training paradigm inherent to modern LLMs.
By Hongyang Chen, Zhongwu Sun, Hongfei Ye, Kunchi Li, Xuemin Lin
arXiv:2606. 24901v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Continual learning capability is critical for Industrial LLMs, as deployed models must be continuously updated to meet evolving requirements and environments, rather than repeatedly retrained from scratch.
By Hao Jiang, Enneng Yang, Guojie Zhu, Yibin Chen, Yunkun Xu, Zifu Kou, Jiayi Li, Chong Chen, Zhao Cao, Li Shen
The paper explores Retrospection-Only Fine-Tuning (ROFT), a method where a language-model agent improves its behavior by generating and training on explanations of its own experiences, without external teachers or reward signals. In software‑engineering tasks with Qwen3.5‑4B, ROFT achieves comparable or better solve rates than GRPO while requiring fewer updates and training time, and can learn from failures alone. Behavioral analysis shows ROFT indirectly assigns credit to actions and can produce shorter, more direct solutions when prompted to focus on direct solutions.
The paper introduces PACEvolve, a framework that improves self‑evolving agents powered by Large Language Models by addressing their tendency to become trapped in local contexts and repeat flawed hypotheses. It does so through three techniques: Hierarchical Context Management to prune memory, Momentum‑Based Backtracking to escape local minima, and a self‑adaptive Collaborative Evolution policy to balance refinement and knowledge transfer. These methods enable the agents to maintain a global view of search momentum and achieve state‑of‑the‑art results on complex evolutionary benchmarks.
By Minghao Yan, Bo Peng, Benjamin Coleman, Ziqi Chen, Zhouhang Xie, Shuo Chen, Zhankui He, Noveen Sachdeva, Isabella Ye, Weili Wang, Chi Wang, Ed H. Chi, Fernando Pereira, Wang-Cheng Kang, Derek Zhiyuan Cheng, Beidou Wang
arXiv:2606. 04751v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in scientific tasks.
By Leonardo Bertolazzi, Katya Tentori, Raffaella Bernardi
The paper investigates how the set of prior iterates influences success in large language model (LLM)-driven discovery tasks. It introduces 12 new harnesses called 'Modular' and evaluates them on five diverse discovery problems, revealing that success is fragile and highly dependent on harness design. The study identifies mode collapse—a sharp loss of iterate diversity—as a common failure, and shows that early discoveries predict final outcomes, leading to a new initialization strategy that consistently improves performance across harnesses and applications.
By Mansi Sakarvadia, Marco Ciccone, Colin Raffel
arXiv:2607. 21461v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep research requires agents to find answers that jointly satisfy multiple constraints.
By Shuqi Lu, Chaofan Li, Kun Luo, Zhang Zhang, Hui Wang, Hongwang Xiao, Zheng Liu, Lei Xiong, Jiahao Wang, Sen Wang, Xiyan Jiang, Wanli Li, Yuyang Hu, Hongjin Qian, Bingyu Yan, Ziyi Xia, Yingxia Shao, Kang Liu, Zhicheng Dou, Di He, Chaozhuo Li, Qiwei Ye, Zhongyuan Wang, Zheng Liu