arXiv AI
EvoSCM: Scientific Belief Revision Through Causal Model Evolution and Experimentation
Read the original on arXiv AI →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv AI.
Related stories
arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 2
DiscoverPhysics: Benchmarking LLMs for Out-of-the-Box Scientific Thinking
arXiv:2605.26087v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Frontier LLMs now perform strongly across a wide range of physics evaluations, but it is hard to disentangle genuine reasoning from recall of...
arXiv AI
Jul 13
Toward Auditable AI Scientists: A Hypothesis Evolution Protocol for LLM Agents
arXiv:2607. 09195v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly expected to play a central role in AI-driven scientific discovery.
arXiv AI
Oct 7
Learning to Outgrow a Theory: Experimental Discovery Beyond the Initial Hypothesis Space
The paper introduces an experimental model‑class revision framework that jointly proposes structural edits to a hypothesis space and diagnostic experiments to test those edits. By coupling a class‑level distinguishability objective with anytime‑valid sequential evidence, the method only revises the model class after the current one is rejected. On 400 controlled dynamical environments, the approach achieves 89.5% exact recovery with 32 experiments, outperforming baselines and transferring well to unseen mechanisms, library insufficiency detection, and other benchmark tasks.
arXiv AI
Jun 9
EvoMaster: A Foundational Evolving Agent Framework for Agentic Science at Scale
arXiv:2604. 17406v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The convergence of large language models and agents is catalyzing a new era of scientific discovery: Agentic Science.
arXiv AI
Jul 8
FirstResearch: Auditable Question Formation for LLM Scientific Discovery Agents
arXiv:2607. 05682v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM systems for scientific discovery increasingly assist with ideation, literature synthesis, experiment planning, and report generation, but the first research question they propose can remain difficult to audit: it may sound plausible without exposing the mechanism, falsifier, or assumption that a scientist should inspect.
arXiv AI
Jun 4
FALSIFYBENCH: Evaluating Inductive Reasoning in LLMs with Rule Discovery Games
arXiv:2606. 04751v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents in scientific tasks.