arXiv:2605. 08318v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the problem of \emph{architecture selection} for deep learning models trained to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), asking when transformer-based architectures with learned attention outperform Fourier-domain neural operators.
By Brandon Yee, Pairie Koh, Jack Rodriguez, Mihir Tekal
Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) provide a meshless approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), but suffer severe degradation in stiff and shock-dominated problems, where small PDE residuals can correspond to globally inaccurate solutions. We show these failures are multi-causal, arising from the concurrent interplay of (i) spectral bias against sharp features, (ii) imbalanced multi-term optimization and loss-weight collapse, (iii) violation of temporal causality, and (iv) under-resolved collocation.
arXiv:2607. 11310v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) provide a meshless approach for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), but suffer severe degradation in stiff and shock-dominated problems, where small PDE residuals can correspond to globally inaccurate solutions.
By Divyavardhan Singh, Dimple Sonone, Hammad Mohammad, Kishor Upla
arXiv:2606. 17460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators are widely used as surrogate solution maps for partial differential equations (PDEs), but full-size models can be costly to store, deploy, and evaluate in many-query scientific workflows.
By Lennon J. Shikhman
arXiv:2608. 08322v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks applied to the level-set formulation of interface advection commonly augment the residual and initial-condition losses with an eikonal regulariser, penalising the deviation of $\|\nabla\phi\|$ from unity.
By Muhammad Akbar Khan
arXiv:2602. 12706v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as fast surrogate solvers for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs).
By Heechang Kim, Qianying Cao, Hyomin Shin, Seungchul Lee, George Em Karniadakis, Minseok Choi
arXiv:2608. 15408v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deep operator networks can become statistically unstable when partial differential equation inputs are observed at thousands of strongly correlated sensors but only a small number of operator samples is available.
By Jiyong Kwon, Bongseok Kim, Guang Lin
arXiv:2607. 05271v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) encounter ill-posed optimization, loss competition, and parameter compensation in partial differential equation (PDE) inverse problems.
By Qian Hu, Bin Fan, Yao Xiao, Zhicheng Lin, Meixin Xiong
arXiv:2608. 08608v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fourier neural operators (FNOs) provide efficient nonlocal spectral learning, but varying geometries and independently chosen discretizations remain difficult to accommodate.
By Roberto Nuca, Giovanni Testa, Luca Galimberti, Matteo Parsani
arXiv:2606. 01122v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We propose a five-step diagnostic protocol for residual-trained neural HJB-PIDE solvers with control-dependent L\'evy jumps, targeting a general failure mode of neural PDE methods: a learned solution can match headline scalar diagnostics while miscomputing an operator inside its training loss.
By R. Drissi
arXiv:2606. 02475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classical finite-difference solvers remain reliable tools for partial differential equations, but their efficiency depends on where mesh resolution is placed.
By Henry Kasumba, Ronald Katende
arXiv:2602. 20062v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Pretraining and fine-tuning are central stages in modern machine learning systems.
By Nicolas Anguita, Francesco Locatello, Andrew M. Saxe, Marco Mondelli, Flavia Mancini, Samuel Lippl, Clementine Domine