arXiv:2607. 02194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers.
By Joseph Webb, Sadok Jerad, Coralia Cartis
arXiv:2605. 24651v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We propose a Weak-form Physics-Informed Neural Operator (WINO), a data-free framework that combines the efficiency of neural operators with the geometric flexibility of the $\varphi$-finite element method ($\varphi$-FEM).
By Bokai Zhu, Yizheng Wang, Qinghui Zhang, Timon Rabczuk
arXiv:2607. 14233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have had a broad research impact in modeling domains governed by partial differential equations (PDE).
By Nilay Anurag, Shital Adhikari, Taniya Kapoor, Nikhil Muralidhar
arXiv:2608. 04222v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Turbulence is a central testbed for machine learning on physical dynamics because its governing laws are known exactly.
By Yilong Dai, Yiming Sun, Yiheng Chen, Shengyu Chen, Peyman Givi, Xiaowei Jia, Runlong Yu
arXiv:2603. 08465v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) offer a mesh-free approach to solving fluid-flow PDEs, standard point-wise residual minimization suffers from convergence pathologies in topologically complex domains like Triply Periodic Minimal Surfaces (TPMS).
By Weizheng Zhang, Xunjie Xie, Hao Pan, Xiaowei Duan, Bingteng Sun, Qiang Du, Lin Lu
arXiv:2606. 25151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) embed governing equations in their loss function, enabling mesh-free solutions to partial differential equations.
By David McShannon, Nicholas Dietrich
arXiv:2606. 02475v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Classical finite-difference solvers remain reliable tools for partial differential equations, but their efficiency depends on where mesh resolution is placed.
By Henry Kasumba, Ronald Katende
arXiv:2605. 08318v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the problem of \emph{architecture selection} for deep learning models trained to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), asking when transformer-based architectures with learned attention outperform Fourier-domain neural operators.
By Brandon Yee, Pairie Koh, Jack Rodriguez, Mihir Tekal
arXiv:2608. 02036v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Extending the neural-operator element method from individually trained, fixed-geometry neural elements to a library of reusable, geometry-parameterized element types fails structurally: a field-predicting operator trained by value regression induces an energy whose assembled Hessian is indefinite, and Newton converges to spurious minima (247% error) even with 1%-accurate field predictions.
By Hongyue Jiang, Jianjiang Zhan, Chenzhuo Zhang, Fan Wang
arXiv:2605. 23391v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for coupled multiphysics systems suffer systematic accuracy degradation as inter-equation coupling strengthens.
By Youngjae Park, Jaemin Kim, Junghwa Hong
arXiv:2606. 27895v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Differentiable partial differential equation (PDE) solvers underpin solver-in-the-loop ML training, gradient-based optimal control, and inverse problems, yet the practical cost of obtaining correct, usable gradients from a given solver on a given problem is largely undocumented.
By Andrin Rehmann, Heiko Zimmermann, Dion H\"afner
arXiv:2606. 12337v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) are central to computational mechanics and are commonly solved by adjoint-based optimization, while physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a flexible alternative.
By Zhen Zhang, Alessandro Alla, George Em Karniadakis