arXiv:2606. 21690v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Phishing is a multi-modal threat.
By Saifelden M. Ismail, Aser O. Ibrahim, Omar A. Mahmoud
arXiv:2512. 10104v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Email phishing is one of the most prevalent and globally consequential vectors of cyber intrusion.
By Najmul Hasan, Prashanth BusiReddyGari, Haitao Zhao, Yihao Ren, Jinsheng Xu, Shaohu Zhang
arXiv:2511. 12085v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Phishing and related cyber threats are becoming increasingly sophisticated, with email-based phishing remaining the most persistent attack vector.
By Sajad U P
arXiv:2606. 11471v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The expansion of the digital domain has resulted in a substantial increase in digital communication, with email emerging as one of the most prominent channels.
By Warren Fernando, Nikos Komninos
The paper introduces a prompt‑injection detection framework for email assistants that models attacks as a chain of stages. It combines a text detector, stage‑specific verifiers, rule‑based risk signals, user intent consistency checks, and a logistic decision policy. Experiments on five benchmarks show the framework outperforms pretrained detectors, achieving a mean F1 of 0.406 versus 0.216, and demonstrate that training on benign emails resembling attacks reduces false alarms.
By Ahmad Hashmi, Dhyey Patel, Yunting Yin
arXiv:2607. 18429v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Phishing emails remain one of the most persistent cybersecurity threats, and machine-learning classifiers are widely used to detect them.
By Tanveer Ahmed, Seyedali Pourmoafil
arXiv:2608. 15893v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rise of social media bots poses a persistent threat, enabling misinformation, opinion manipulation, and the erosion of trust in online platforms.
By Nof Orenstein, Yoni Birman
arXiv:2606. 00889v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Phishing attacks remain a major cybersecurity threat, exploiting deceptive URLs to steal sensitive user information.
By Uche Unoke Emmanuel, Gideon Francis Oghie
WAInjectBench introduces the first comprehensive benchmark for detecting prompt injection attacks against web agents, offering a fine‑grained categorization of threats and datasets that include malicious and benign text and image samples. The study systematically evaluates both text‑based and image‑based detection methods across multiple scenarios, revealing that detectors perform well on attacks with explicit instructions or visible perturbations but struggle with subtle or instruction‑free attacks. The authors release the datasets and code to facilitate further research in this area.
By Yinuo Liu, Xilong Wang, Ruohan Xu, Yuqi Jia, Neil Zhenqiang Gong
arXiv:2507.15393v2 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Phishing email is a critical step in the cybercrime kill chain due to the high reachability of victims' email accounts and the low cost of la...
By Ruofan Liu, Yun Lin, Yuxin Wang, Xiwen Teoh, Zhenkai Liang, Gongshen Liu, Haojin Zhu, Jin Song Dong
CogniDir is an adaptive distributional learning framework designed to improve fake news detection against new psychologically grounded malicious comments generated by Large Language Models. It reframes robust detection as a dynamic data mixture optimization problem, using cognitive psychology to formalize adversarial paradigms and an information‑theoretic score to guide adaptive sampling of training data. Experiments on three benchmarks show that CogniDir achieves state‑of‑the‑art robustness, boosting F1 scores by up to 17.9% over existing baselines under heterogeneous AI‑generated attacks.
By Zhao Tong, Chunlin Gong, Yimeng Gu, Haichao Shi, Qiang Liu, Shu Wu, Xingcheng Xu, Xiao-Yu Zhang
The paper reports a reproducible study of evasion attacks on image and text classifiers. A compact convolutional network on MNIST achieved 98.63% clean accuracy but dropped to 60.20% under FGSM with ε=0.15 and 1.72% with ε=0.30, while PGD reduced accuracy to 32.47% and 0.41%; a bit‑depth‑reduction defense only partially restored performance. In contrast, a DistilBERT model fine‑tuned on the SMS Spam Collection reached 98.75% accuracy and 94.96% F1‑score, yet a sequence of predefined perturbations produced only modest probability shifts and did not flip spam to ham predictions.
By Parker Hummel (Minot State University), Ryne Skabo (Minot State University), Muhammad Abusaqer (Minot State University)