The paper introduces a latent information sharing scheme for federated learning that mitigates client drift by sharing a small amount of hidden‑layer activations. The authors demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this approach improves training efficiency while maintaining convergence guarantees and data privacy. Compared to existing methods such as FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedPVR, FedProto, and SplitFed, the proposed method achieves higher model accuracy within a fixed round budget without adding significant communication overhead.
By Seungjun Lee, Ensieh Khazaei, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Baturalp Buyukates, Sunwoo Lee
The paper proposes a new federated learning approach called FedALS that reduces communication costs by varying aggregation frequencies across model layers. It derives tighter generalization bounds for one‑round and multi‑round federated learning, linking these bounds to local updates and data heterogeneity. Based on representation‑learning insights, the authors argue that infrequent aggregation of early layers and more frequent aggregation of final layers yields more generalizable models, especially in non‑iid settings, and demonstrate the method’s effectiveness experimentally.
By Peyman Gholami, Hulya Seferoglu
arXiv:2606. 28835v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) emerged as a promising distributed machine learning paradigm.
By Wenhao Yuan, Chenchen Lin, Jian Chen, Jinfeng Xu, Zewei Liu, Edith Cheuk Han Ngai
arXiv:2606. 30161v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning typically aggregates client updates using fixed or heuristic weighting rules, which can be suboptimal when clients have heterogeneous data and varying contributions to the global model.
By Dario Fenoglio, Daniil Kirilenko, Martin Gjoreski, Marc Langheinrich
arXiv:2408. 05886v5 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Heterogeneous system configurations of distributed clients connected to the central server (CS) via a time-varying wireless network pose significant challenges for popular distributed machine learning (ML) algorithms such as federated learning (FL).
By Ferdous Pervej, Minseok Choi, Andreas F. Molisch
arXiv:2608. 15639v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: \textit{Split Federated Learning} (SFL) enables distributed model training by splitting networks between the server and clients.
By Wenhao Yuan, Chenchen Lin, Wenhao Hu, Jian Chen, Jinfeng Xu, Shujie Li, Edith Cheuk Han Ngai
\textit{Split Federated Learning} (SFL) enables distributed model training by splitting networks between the server and clients. However, under client heterogeneity, the conventional static split stra...
arXiv:2409. 04111v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Vertical federated learning is a natural and elegant approach to integrate multi-view data vertically partitioned across devices (clients) while preserving their privacies.
By Jiyuan Liu, Siqi Wang, Xinhang Wan, Yi Zhang, Junsong Chen, Xin Lu, Xinwang Liu
The paper addresses the mismatch between learner and client data distributions in federated learning, noting that traditional client selection methods often ignore this misalignment. It introduces a dynamic, influence-aware client selection framework that uses a small proxy dataset to estimate each client's utility for the learner’s objective, prioritizing informative sources while mitigating noise and heterogeneity. Experiments on CIFAR-10 with heterogeneous partitions show the proposed method outperforms static and dynamic baselines, achieving faster convergence and higher accuracy.
By Yiming Xie, Lili Su, Ningfang Mi
The paper introduces Trusted Multi-view learning with Unified Routing (TMUR), a method that separates view-specific evidence extraction from fusion arbitration in multi-view classification. TMUR employs view-private experts, a collaborative expert, and a unified router that assigns sample-level weights based on global context, along with soft load-balancing and diversity regularization to promote balanced and discriminative expert use. Experiments on 14 datasets show that TMUR consistently improves classification accuracy and reliability compared to 15 recent baselines.
By Yilin Zhang, Cai Xu, Haishun Chen, Ziyu Guan, Wei Zhao
arXiv:2502. 08829v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning (FL) with non-IID data often degrades client performance below local training baselines.
By Ahmed Elhussein, Florent Pollet, Gamze G\"ursoy
arXiv:2608. 12108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients while keeping data local.
By Mirko Konstantin, Stefan Zachow, Anirban Mukhopadhyay