The paper introduces a latent information sharing scheme for federated learning that mitigates client drift by sharing a small amount of hidden‑layer activations. The authors demonstrate both theoretically and empirically that this approach improves training efficiency while maintaining convergence guarantees and data privacy. Compared to existing methods such as FedProx, SCAFFOLD, FedPVR, FedProto, and SplitFed, the proposed method achieves higher model accuracy within a fixed round budget without adding significant communication overhead.
By Seungjun Lee, Ensieh Khazaei, Dimitrios Hatzinakos, Baturalp Buyukates, Sunwoo Lee
arXiv:2606. 14416v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) often struggles with generalization due to heterogeneous client data.
By Dongwon Kim, Donghee Kim, Sung Kuk Shyn, Kwangsu Kim
arXiv:2604. 24012v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated learning enables a population of clients to collaboratively train machine learning models without exchanging their raw data, but standard algorithms such as FedAvg suffer from slow convergence and high communication and memory costs in heterogeneous, resource-constrained environments.
By Yutong He, Zhengyang Huang, Jiahe Geng, Kun Yuan
arXiv:2601. 09304v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables distributed learning across multiple clients without sharing raw data.
By Sota Sugawara, Yuji Kawamata, Akihiro Toyoda, Tomoru Nakayama, Yukihiko Okada
arXiv:2405. 16472v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Contemporary AI faces the challenge of balancing generality with user-specific personalization.
By Shutong Chen, Guodong Long, Tianyi Zhou, Jie Ma, Jing Jiang, Chengqi Zhang
arXiv:2608. 14654v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) is a collaborative paradigm that enables multiple devices to train a global model while preserving local data privacy.
By Hai Anh Tran, Cuong Ta, Truong X. Tran
arXiv:2606. 16891v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning is rapidly evolving beyond the exchange of traditional model weights and gradients, yet existing definitions fail to capture the full scope of modern payloads like synthetic data and federated analytics.
By Alvaro Javier Vargas Guerrero, Xinguang Wang, Quang Manh Doan, Guy Nagels
arXiv:2607. 08368v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: With the widespread deployment of basic models in edge intelligence, communication bandwidth has become a core bottleneck restricting the scalability of federated learning.
By Lingyu Qiu, Daniela Annunziata, Stefano Izzo, Fabio Giampaolo, Francesco Piccialli
arXiv:2607. 04170v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) enables decentralized training without data sharing, but suffers from statistical heterogeneity across clients, leading to client drift, poor generalization, and sharp minima compared to centralized training.
By Liyang Yuan, Yibo Yang, Dandan Guo
FedPCD introduces a priority-constrained federated optimization framework that decouples the global aggregation objective from client protection. By preserving the standard federated aggregate and applying only minimal corrections to satisfy client performance constraints, FedPCD achieves higher global accuracy and improved worst‑10% client accuracy across heterogeneous benchmarks. The method also maintains competitive trade‑offs between global accuracy and client variability while converging faster with fewer communication rounds.
By Yousef Irshaid, Dara Varam, Mohamed I. AlHajri
arXiv:2606. 30161v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated learning typically aggregates client updates using fixed or heuristic weighting rules, which can be suboptimal when clients have heterogeneous data and varying contributions to the global model.
By Dario Fenoglio, Daniil Kirilenko, Martin Gjoreski, Marc Langheinrich
arXiv:2608. 12108v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across distributed clients while keeping data local.
By Mirko Konstantin, Stefan Zachow, Anirban Mukhopadhyay