arXiv:2609.36563v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Visual emotion recognition commonly assumes that all evidence required for prediction is contained in the observed image or video. Yet the same visible...
By Yihao Qian, Runhao Zeng, Sicheng Zhao, Feng Liang, Hongmin Cai, Mingkui Tan
arXiv:2608. 07867v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal emotion recognition often treats self-reported labels as reliable supervision while overlooking self-report unreliability and cross-modal conflict.
By Bojing Hou, Ruohao Li, Yitong Zhu, Luwen Yu, Yuyang Wang
The paper introduces CHIARO, a 1,000-sentence benchmark for contrastive emotion inference grounded in appraisal theory, where each scenario elicits a positive emotion in one person and a negative emotion in another. The dataset covers ten emotion classes and is human‑annotated. Evaluation shows that the best large language model achieves 67.3 macro‑F1, below human agreement, while existing emotion classifiers perform near chance. When used as a training signal alongside an existing emotion corpus, models improve on CHIARO and on six of ten external emotion benchmarks, demonstrating its value as a complementary training resource.
By Divyesh Bommana, Mohammad Saim, Tianyu Jiang
arXiv:2609.38182v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Avatar-based multimodal empathetic response generation has emerged as a pivotal capability in human-centric systems, aiming to recognize user emotion...
By Xiaolin Chen, Xuemeng Song, Jinlan Fu, Weili Guan, Mong-Li Lee, Wynne Hsu
EmoMed is a multimodal medical consultation agent that tailors its responses to users' emotional states—such as anxiety, confusion, or urgency—while preserving clinical accuracy. It processes text and medical images, detects affect indicators, and adjusts tone, structure, and detail accordingly. The system ensures factual reliability through a dual retrieval mechanism that combines web-based fact‑checking with an API‑connected, continuously updated medical knowledge base, and it has been evaluated across seven state‑of‑the‑art language models using comprehensive metrics, showing that emotionally adaptive responses outperform neutral baselines without sacrificing accuracy.
By Ivan Nasonov, Nikita Glazkov, Ivan Makovetskiy, Mikhail Mozikov, Daniil Sukhorukov, Andrey Savchenko, Ilya Makarov
arXiv:2608. 04509v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Vision-language systems combine images with retrieved text, but these sources can disagree or jointly fail to support an answer.
By De Jiang, Zhengyang Zhang, Kehong Yuan, Shaohua Ma
HUG‑VIS is a unified multimodal benchmark for human‑centered visual intelligence, comprising 8,400 half‑body videos of 30 professional actors performing 280 emotion‑action prompts in Mandarin. The dataset provides synchronized video, audio, text, and alpha mattes for four tasks—human emotion recognition, video generation, voice cloning, and video matting—allowing evaluation of both open‑ and closed‑source models under a zero‑shot protocol. Results reveal that linguistic cues dominate emotion recognition, visual affect is weakest, and that automatic metrics and human judgments diverge in generation and cloning tasks, while motion‑related boundary fidelity remains a key challenge for matting.
By Fei Ma, Zebang Cheng, Minghui Li, Hongbo Xu, Yuyong Tan, Yihua Shao, Hanling Wang, Zhou Liu, Yuqing Gao, Dong Wang, Long Ma, Laizhong Cui, Nicu Sebe, Qi Tian
arXiv:2607. 25961v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Ambivalence and hesitancy (A/H) are conflicting affective states that precede the delay or abandonment of health behaviour change.
By Podakanti Satyajith Chary, Barath Parthiban, Pranesh Velmurugan, Adeeba Khan, Nagarajan Ganapathy
arXiv:2606. 15779v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Multimodal models can name the action units (AUs) behind a facial emotion, but their AU->emotion rationales are typically plausible rather than faithful: nothing forces the AUs a model invokes to be the AUs that actually drive its prediction.
By Van Thong Huynh, Hong Hai Nguyen, Thuy Pham, Trong Nghia Nguyen, Soo-Hyung Kim
EmoDistill is an offline framework that distills emotional negotiation skills from large language model interactions into smaller agents. It separates emotion selection, handled by an Implicit Q‑Learning selector, from emotion‑conditioned expression, learned by a LoRA‑adapted 7B policy via supervised fine‑tuning and judge policy optimization. Experiments across four negotiation domains show that the full EmoDistill policy outperforms vanilla and IQL‑only baselines, while removing the explicit emotion channel markedly reduces negotiation utility and reveals partial, domain‑dependent transfer to unseen counterparties.
By Yunbo Long, Haolang Zhao, Lukas Beckenbauer, Liming Xu, Alexandra Brintrup
arXiv:2606. 00851v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Empathetic spoken dialogue systems must infer a user's emotional state to respond appropriately, yet everyday speech often carries weak, neutral, or ambiguous affective cues.
By Sukru Samet Dindar, Riki Shimizu, Xilin Jiang, Nima Mesgarani
arXiv:2607. 00661v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explanations for emotion classifiers are usually produced post hoc, with no guarantee that they reflect the computation behind the label.
By Frank Xing, Erik Cambria