arXiv AI By Elyas Rashno, Farhana Zulkernine

An Agentic Approach with Evidence-Grounded Verification for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning in Conversation

Read the original on arXiv AI →

The paper proposes an agentic framework for multimodal emotion reasoning that uses frozen models to avoid costly instruction tuning. It employs modality‑specific perception agents, an integration agent, and an MLLM critic to generate emotion predictions with evidence citations, followed by an evidence‑grounded verification stage that identifies errors and applies targeted prompt patches without updating model weights. On the MER2025 dataset, this approach improves F‑score across several large language‑vision models, outperforming static pipelines and matching or exceeding reflection baselines.

Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI
Oct 26

CASE: Confusion-Aware Skill Evolution for Frozen Multimodal Emotion Models

The paper introduces CASE, a Confusion-Aware Skill Evolution framework designed to improve Multimodal Emotion Recognition (MER) by addressing systematic confusion between semantically adjacent emotions. CASE builds a sparse, self‑evolving library of pair‑specific EmotionSkills that externalize affective expertise from frozen multimodal large language model (MLLM) backbones, allowing continuous refinement and transfer across different models. Experiments on CA‑MER, DFEW, and EMER benchmarks show that CASE significantly boosts accuracy, notably raising Qwen3‑VL‑8B’s performance from 46.80% to 59.13%.

By Siyu Wu, Zeyu Liang, Linghao Wang, Qiyun Zheng, Yi Yao, Ling Lo, Hongxia Xie
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 22

Cognitive Action Reasoning for Proactive Robots from Human-Centered Multimodal Observations

The paper introduces ProAction, a multimodal dataset of 10,000 samples comprising visual, audio, and text inputs across 12 daily-life scenarios, designed to support the Proactive Robot Action Reasoning (ProRobo) problem. It presents a two-stage human-in-the-loop annotation pipeline that incorporates appraisal and Theory-of-Mind considerations to generate cognitively grounded high-level action labels. The authors benchmark multimodal large language models and propose MMC2Act, showing that training on ProAction significantly improves proactive action reasoning compared to general-purpose models.

By Zhihao Gu, Kechao Zhu, Yuanfeng Wu, Mohan Liu, Ankit Kumar Shaw, ChenDong Hong, Xuanyu Chen, Dengchen Mei, Xu Tianyi, Lin Wang
arXiv AI
Oct 9

Cognition-Oriented Emotion Tracing from Causes to Consequences in Real-World Social Scenes

The paper introduces TRACE, a cognition-oriented framework that models affective episodes as a sequence of Condition, Affect, and Effect stages, incorporating observable cues and cognitive factors like appraisal and regulation. TRACE-Bench evaluates multimodal models on five tasks—grounded affect recognition, regulation decoding, cause reasoning, effect reasoning, and full-chain reconstruction—using 3,746 question-answer pairs from 646 videos. The authors also present TRACER, a structured reasoning method that links each inference to explicit premises, achieving superior performance across all tasks compared to existing baselines.

By Hao Li, Jinye Zhang, Bobo Li, Mong-Li Lee, Wynne Hsu, Zheng Wang, Hao Fei, Min Zhang
arXiv Computation and Language
1d ago

SpeechEQ: Benchmarking Emotional Intelligence Quotient in Socially Aware Voice Conversational Models

SpeechEQ is a new benchmark that evaluates the sociolinguistic reasoning of Speech‑Language Models (SLMs) by using a dataset of 2,265 dialogues covering 15 Emotional Quotient (EQ) subscales from EQ‑i 2.0 theory. The framework introduces a multi‑turn evaluation protocol and a Spoken EQ (SEQ) score inspired by human EQ assessments. Experiments reveal that current multimodal models suffer from a text‑reliant shortcut, an alignment‑induced safety trap, and contextual amnesia, limiting their emotional awareness in spoken interaction.

By Liang-Yuan Wu, Zih-Ching Chen, Tongshuang Wu, Chao-Han Huck Yang, Hua Shen
arXiv AI
Aug 3

M3MAD-Bench: Multi-Dimensional Evaluation of Multi-Agent Debate Across Domains and Modalities

arXiv:2601. 02854v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As an agent-level reasoning and coordination paradigm, Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) orchestrates multiple agents through structured debate to improve answer quality and support complex reasoning.

By Ao Li, Jinghui Zhang, Luyu Li, Yuxiang Duan, Lang Gao, Mingcai Chen, Weijun Qin, Shaopeng Li, Fengxian Ji, Ning Liu, Lizhen Cui, Xiuying Chen, Yuntao Du