The paper introduces Provenance Density, an interface that visualizes the density of verified claims within a text to counter the Fluency Trap—where users mistake fluent AI-generated hallucinations for truth. In a study with 81 participants, the interface significantly improved users’ ability to distinguish true from fabricated content, while no signal led to no discernment. A technical audit of 200 samples revealed that retrieval density alone is insufficient, and that the Consistency Veto provides most of the discriminative power for dynamic queries.
By Qing Zhang, Yifei Huang, Juyoung Lee, Thad Starner, Jun Rekimoto
The paper argues that explainable AI for computer vision has focused too much on developing interpretability methods rather than assessing how interpretable the models themselves are. It proposes a shift toward model-centric evaluation, using existing tools to compare what different models represent and compute, and emphasizes the need to measure whether humans can truly understand these models. The authors review the current toolbox, survey limited model comparison work, draw parallels to systems neuroscience, and outline a future agenda for model-focused XAI.
By Julien Colin, Nuria Oliver, Thomas Serre
arXiv:2607. 22600v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Information visualizations are widely used to communicate patterns, trends, and outliers, yet deceptive design choices-such as truncated or inverted axes, distorted aspect ratios, inappropriate encodings, and misleading color mappings-can systematically alter interpretation while preserving the underlying data.
By Ridwan Mahbub, Mohammed Saidul Islam, Md Tahmid Rahman Laskar, Mizanur Rahman, Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Enamul Hoque
arXiv:2605. 02640v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: As artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) models and foundation models (FMs), are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains, ensuring their trustworthiness has become a central challenge.
By Ruta Binkyte, Ivaxi Sheth, Zhijing Jin, Mohammad Havaei, Bernhard Sch\"olkopf, Mario Fritz
arXiv:2607. 25021v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) can connect visualization patterns to external causes, consequences, and domain knowledge, but the evidential basis of these interpretations is often unclear.
By Ishrat Jahan Eliza, Md Dilshadur Rahman
arXiv:2602. 15278v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The web is littered with images, once created for human consumption and now increasingly interpreted by agents using vision-language models (VLMs).
By Manuel Cherep, Pranav M R, Pattie Maes, Nikhil Singh
The paper introduces a synthetic ground‑truth framework for evaluating explainable AI (XAI) methods, addressing the lack of reliable evaluation procedures. By using controlled interventions to create datasets where the importance of input components is known, the framework generates ground‑truth explanations that align with the model’s actual decision process. The authors apply this approach to binary images, tabular data, and time series, and find that nine popular XAI methods exhibit significant limitations, underscoring the need for intervention‑based benchmarks.
By Miquel Mir\'o-Nicolau, Francesco Spinnato, Riccardo Guidotti
arXiv:2609.01383v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision Language Models have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in interpreting static visual artifacts, but modern data analysis is inherently dynamic...
By Maeve Hutchinson, Syed Mahbubul Huq, Mohammad Albinhassan, Radu Jianu, Aidan Slingsby, Pranava Madhyastha
The paper introduces a new type of adversarial attack on automated fact‑checking systems that uses large language models to rephrase claims with persuasive techniques. By applying 15 persuasion methods across five categories, the authors evaluate how these rewrites affect claim verification and evidence retrieval on the FEVER and FEVEROUS benchmarks. Results show that persuasive rewrites significantly degrade both verification accuracy and evidence retrieval performance, underscoring the vulnerability of current fact‑checking systems to such attacks.
By Jo\~ao A. Leite, Olesya Razuvayevskaya, Kalina Bontcheva, Carolina Scarton
XAI-Arena proposes using large language models (LLMs) as judges to evaluate the quality of explainable AI (XAI) explanations, aiming for reproducibility, scalability, and multidimensional assessment. The framework assesses dimensions such as simplicity, clarity, task adequacy, trust calibration, actionability, transparency, faithfulness, and overall interpretability across different datasets, models, and stakeholder personas. Human validation shows a strong positive correlation between LLM-generated and human ratings (Spearman's rho = .693, p < .001), supporting the viability of LLM-based evaluations.
By Yanfei Hu Fleischhauer, Alona Zharova, Nadja Klein, Stefan Feuerriegel
arXiv:2603. 28583v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Despite the success of Vision-Language Models (VLMs), misleading charts remain a significant challenge due to their deceptive visual structures and distorted data representations.
By Yanjie Zhang, Yafei Li, Rui Sheng, Zixin Chen, Yanna Lin, Huamin Qu, Lei Chen, Yushi Sun
Generative image models can produce highly realistic images, raising concerns about potential misuse in creating deceptive content. Current deepfake approaches face several challenges, including limit...