The paper presents a systematic study of how different compression techniques—pruning, quantization, and distillation—affect the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in tasks such as mathematics, code generation, and question answering. It introduces a framework that measures capability loss and relates it to factors like model size, training stage, and compression settings, yielding simple predictive relations that generalize across unseen configurations. The authors demonstrate that sharing density responses across pruning levels can dramatically reduce the number of measurements needed, and that their predictive models closely match regression results while offering efficient decision guidance for compression method selection.
By Xueqi Cheng, Liang Wu, Kelly Wan, Liangjie Hong, Yushun Dong
arXiv:2609.13154v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have made prompts increasingly large and complex. Techniques such as chain-of-thought reasoning (Wei et...
By Shamin Chokshi
arXiv:2609.27510v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Modern large language models are pretrained on massive datasets, making it difficult to prevent benchmark data from entering their training sets and...
By Kaifeng Tan, Yudong Li, Linlin Shen
arXiv:2608.28809v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Extreme low-bit inference offers a route toward smaller models and constrained deployment. Ternary language models restrict weights to $\{-1,0,+1\}$, a...
By Anirudh Malik, M Sparsh Mehra, Poojith Devan
arXiv:2605.30018v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) frequently achieve impressive scores on standardized benchmarks, yet accuracy alone offers a limited view of the...
By Tanmoy Chakraborty, Ayan Sengupta, Suparna Bhattacharya, Partha Pratim Chakrabarti, Amlan Chakrabarti, Supratik Chakraborty, Partha Pratim Das, Lipika Dey, Richa Singh, Mayank Vatsa
Modern large language models are pretrained on massive datasets, making it difficult to prevent benchmark data from entering their training sets and undermining the reliability of evaluation results....
arXiv:2606. 27866v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) language models scale model ability with sparsely activated experts, making this architecture a standard recipe for modern large models.
By Fan Mo, Yuxuan Han, Geng Zhang, Wangbo Zhao, Yang You
arXiv:2606. 24083v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: "Talk short.
By Morayo Danielle Adeyemi, Ryan A. Rossi, Franck Dernoncourt
arXiv:2610.14918v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Evaluating an agent's ability to strictly satisfy diverse and procedurally complex requirements is essential to determining its practical reliability....
By Zhengxi Li, Junyi Zhou, Qiyuan Zhang, Chuhan Wu, Fuyuan Lyu, Le Tian, Xiao Zhou, Chen Ma, Yufei Wang
arXiv:2512. 22671v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Structured width pruning of GLU-MLP layers in Llama-3.
By Pere Martra
arXiv:2603. 03824v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Humans often become more self-aware under threat, yet can lose self-awareness when absorbed in a task; we hypothesize that language models exhibit environment-dependent \textit{evaluation awareness}.
By Maheep Chaudhary
arXiv:2608. 13565v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures scale large language models (LLMs) while preserving computational efficiency through sparse activation.
By Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Shantanu Godbole, Hritvik Shrivastava