The study investigates how post‑training quantization (PTQ) affects proactive interference (PI) in large language models. Using bitsandbytes, the authors compare FP16, INT8, and INT4/NF4 precision across three instruction‑tuned models and find that INT4 quantization markedly degrades accuracy under high interference, with INT8 also incurring a smaller penalty in two of the three models. The degradation is linked to increased same‑key intrusion errors and originates in the quantized transformer backbone rather than the output layer.
By Shayan Shahrabi-Farahani (Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran), Dara Rahmati (Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran)
arXiv:2609.01587v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Post-training quantization (PTQ) is widely used to reduce the cost of serving large language models (LLMs), but its accuracy cost is uneven and is ofte...
By Jundong Hu, Shekar Ramachandran
The paper reports a post‑training ternarization of the 4‑billion‑parameter Qwen model, achieving an effective 1.641‑bit representation for 81.62 % of its weights while keeping activations at 16‑bit precision. Accuracy drops from 64.5 % to 54.7 % across ten capability tests, with uneven degradation (e.g., BoolQ 84.6 % of teacher performance, ARC‑Challenge 43.8 %). After packing the ternary planes, the model size shrinks from 8.29 GiB to 3.96 GiB with negligible change in perplexity, though inference speed is not improved.
By Anirudh Malik, M Sparsh Mehra, Poojith Devan
arXiv:2609.00224v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Weight-only post-training quantization (PTQ) can alleviate the computational burden of serving large language models (LLMs) at scale. However, existi...
By Yipin Guo, Arun M George, Jie Fu, Tareq Mahmoud, Sixue Xing, Siddharth Joshi
arXiv:2607. 09999v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We show that post-training quantization can silently alter how large language models reason even when task accuracy is preserved.
By Renuka Oladri, Mohan Vamsi Varadaraju Priya, Jerry Wu
Post-training quantization lowers the memory footprint of Large Language Models (LLMs) and speeds up inference, which is why it is now common for on-device deployment. Most of what we know about its e...
arXiv:2512. 18934v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Catastrophic forgetting poses a fundamental challenge in continual learning, particularly when models are quantized for deployment efficiency.
By Michael S. Zhang, Rishi A. Ruia, Arnav Kewalram, Saathvik Dharmapuram, Utkarsh Sharma, Kevin Zhu
Almost every large language model that reaches a broad audience is quantized: trained in full precision, then compressed for efficiency. This step is assumed harmless and its safety is rarely re-checked.
arXiv:2607. 08734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Post-training quantization is widely used to deploy large language models in resource-constrained settings, yet its evaluation relies almost exclusively on accuracy and perplexity.
By Baha Rababah, Cuneyt Gurcan Akcora, Carson K. Leung
arXiv:2602. 15327v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Machine learning model performance improvements tend to arise from competition and application.
By Hanlin Zhang, Jikai Jin, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Sham Kakade
arXiv:2607. 11020v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Continual learning promises a language model that keeps acquiring knowledge after training, with each new fact written into its weights.
By Charles O'Neill
arXiv:2607. 25583v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and low-bit quantization are now standard tools for adapting language models under tight compute budgets, yet their interaction is most often studied on billion-parameter models where the design space is expensive to explore.
By Mahendra Singh Rathor, Anagheem Azzam