arXiv Machine Learning

Complementary Attention Head Pruning for Efficient Transformers

arXiv:2606. 19150v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The remarkable success of Transformer-based models in natural language processing stems from architectural scaling, which leads to a large number of parameters and hinders deployment in resource-constrained environments.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 23

Magnitude Profile Pruning: Calibration-Free Structured Attention Head Removal for Transformer Compression

Magnitude Profile Pruning introduces a training‑free, calibration‑free method for removing attention heads in Transformer models by statistically detecting outliers in weight row norms. Heads whose projection weights fall within the bulk of the distribution are pruned, while outlier heads are retained. Across several models, the MP‑G variant achieves superior perplexity at various sparsity levels and yields significant parameter and FLOP reductions without requiring forward passes, calibration data, or gradient computations.

By Kasun Dewage, Marianna Pensky, Heranga K. Rathnasekara, Suranadi De Silva
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 21

NIRVANA: Structured Pruning Reimagined for Large Language Model Compression

arXiv:2509. 14230v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While structured pruning presents a highly effective pathway for accelerating Large Language Model (LLM) inference, existing methods frequently suffer from significant performance degradation and demand computationally retraining to recover capabilities.

By Mengting Ai, Tianxin Wei, Sirui Chen, Jingrui He
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 31

Pruning Laws for Large Language Models

arXiv:2504.04342v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Scaling up model parameters and training data consistently improves the performance of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of rapidly gro...

By Ayan Sengupta, Siddhant Chaudhary, Tanmoy Chakraborty
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

Not All Attention Heads Contribute to Critical Visual Token Selection: Head-Aware Pruning Matters More

The paper shows that only a small subset of attention heads in vision-language models is responsible for selecting critical visual tokens. By pruning tokens based on similarity before LLM reasoning and then applying head‑aware pruning during reasoning, the proposed ProViP framework achieves high task performance with significant speedups. Experiments on LLaVA‑1.5‑7B demonstrate 95.9% performance retention and a 1.62× inference speedup at an 88.9% pruning ratio.

By Chaofang Ma, Lin Jiang, Carol Jingyi Li, Xingyu Liu, Zeyu Li, Jiang Xu, Wei Zhang