arXiv:2408. 01382v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Originating in game theory, Shapley values are widely used for explaining a machine learning model's prediction by quantifying the contribution of each feature's value to the prediction.
arXiv:2608. 11508v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Machine learning pipelines commonly flatten relational data into single-table representations, discarding structural constraints.
arXiv:2606. 02247v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Shapley values are a principled attribution measure widely used in interpretable machine learning, but their exact computation scales exponentially with the number of players, motivating a wide range of approximation methods based on value function evaluations of sampled coalitions.
arXiv:2508. 07952v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Clustering algorithms often assume all features contribute equally to the data structure, an assumption that usually fails in high-dimensional or noisy settings.
arXiv:2603. 14014v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We introduce Aumann-SHAP, an interaction-aware framework that decomposes counterfactual transitions by restricting the model to a local hypercube connecting baseline and counterfactual features.
arXiv:2512. 15765v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Data valuation is a natural framework for understanding which preference datasets matter most when aligning a Large Language Model (LLM) using multiple sources.
arXiv:2607. 09869v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The Shapley value is a widely used concept in attribution problems, as it uniquely satisfies the axioms of linearity, consistency, equal treatment, and efficiency.
arXiv:2606. 28065v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Understanding model predictions is essential for physical applications, where outputs often inform safety-critical decisions, such as structural load assessment, weather warnings, and clinical diagnosis.
arXiv:2607. 18979v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at multi-step reasoning, yet current parallel reasoning approaches often fail to distinguish the contributions of individual reasoning paths.
The paper introduces the concept of observational multiplicity, where multiple probabilistic classifiers can perform similarly yet produce conflicting predictions, undermining interpretability and safety. It proposes measuring this arbitrariness through a regret metric that captures how predictions could shift with different training labels. The authors present a general method to estimate regret, show it varies across dataset groups, and discuss its use for safety via abstention and targeted data collection.
arXiv:2604. 15107v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Shapley values provide a flexible framework for attributing feature contributions to model predictions, but they are not naturally suited for feature selection: a feature may receive a positive attribution even when it is redundant given the remaining variables.
arXiv:2603. 03672v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: The Shapley value provides a principled foundation for data valuation, but exact computation is #P-hard due to the exponential coalition space.
arXiv:2510. 22138v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We show how to replace the O(2^n) coalition enumeration over n features behind Shapley values and Shapley-style interaction indices with a few-evaluation scheme on a tensor-network (TN) surrogate: TN-SHAP.