arXiv Computer Vision

Performance of Machine Learning Classification in Sonomammogram Images using BI-RADS

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 27

Less Contouring, More Accuracy: Lesion-Guided ROI Deep Learning for Ovarian Ultrasound Classification

The study evaluates lesion‑guided region‑of‑interest (ROI) deep learning for ovarian ultrasound classification, comparing it to global image, lesion contour, and contour‑based radiomics approaches across two public datasets. Using four deep‑learning architectures, the lesion‑guided ROI strategy achieved the highest accuracy (93.10% on MMOTU and 97.56% on OUD) with an AUC of 0.99, while requiring less annotation effort than contour‑based methods.

By Mehran Ahmad, Ali Abbasian Ardakani, Afshin Mohammadi, Alisa Mohebbi, Gernot Kronreif, Sepideh Hatamikia
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 14

BiLoG-Net: A Bi-Context Location-Guided Network for Breast Mass Segmentation and Malignancy Classification in Mammography

arXiv:2607. 10188v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Breast cancer remains the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide, yet accurate detection and characterization of breast masses in mammography remain challenging due to subtle intensity variations, heterogeneous tissue densities, and indistinct lesion boundaries that complicate radiological interpretation.

By Abu Fatema Mohammad Abdun Noor, Md Imam Ahasan, Md Samiul Ahasan, Kah Ong Michael Goh, S M Hasan Mahmud, Raihana Zannat
arXiv Machine Learning
Jul 30

Rethinking Clinical Relevance in Chest X-ray Machine Learning: How Evaluation References Define Performance

arXiv:2607. 26333v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chest X-ray (CXR) machine learning relies heavily on automated evaluation using reference standards that aim to approximate clinical judgment.

By Panagiotis Fytas, Ian Selby, Clemens Karner, Judith Babar, Simon Baker, Jake Beckford, Timothy J. Sadler, Shahab Shahipasand, Arthikkaa Thavakumar, John Li Chen, Alex Sawer, Michael Roberts, Jonathan Weir-McCall, J. H. F. Rudd, Carola-Bibiane Sch\"onlieb, Anna Korhonen, Anna Breger
arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

Deep Learning-based Intelligent Diagnosis of Congenital Uterine Anomalies in 3D Ultrasound

arXiv:2609.15225v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Objective: To develop an intelligent framework, termed CUA-Net, for the automated classification of congenital uterine anomalies (CUA) without requirin...

By Yueyue Xu, Yuhao Huang, Jiaxiao Deng, Yuanji Zhang, Haoming Zhang, Jiajia Qu, Shiying Zheng, Xiaomei Tang, Haining Chen, Chengcai Chen, Yiyi Wu, Xin Yang, Dong Ni
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 12

BreastMammo and DenseMammo: Benchmarks for Mammography Domain Generalization

arXiv:2608. 10271v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Breast density classification is a critical component of breast cancer risk assessment, yet AI models often struggle to generalize across clinical sites due to vendor-specific acquisition styles.

By Hongyi Pan, Gorkem Durak, Halil Ertugrul Aktas, Andrea Mia Bejar, Mustafa Ege Seker, Nebile Alibeyoglu, Rumeysa Guclu, Rana Gunoz Comert Bozkurt, Sibel Ozkan Gurdal, Neslihan Cabioglu, Beyza Ozcinar, Ravza Yilmaz, Vahit Ozmen, Erkin Aribal, Sukru Mehmet Erturk, Yalda Zafari, Mohamed Mabrok, Kayhan Batmanghelich, Mohammad Yaqub, Ziyue Xu, Ulas Bagci
arXiv AI
4d ago

ProtoCAM: Interpretable Few-Shot Mask-Guided Prototypical Learning for Breast Lesion Classification in Ultrasound Imaging

ProtoCAM is an explainable few‑shot learning framework for classifying breast lesions in ultrasound images. It combines mask‑guided feature encoding, prototypical metric learning, and gradient‑based visual explanations to leverage limited annotated data. Evaluated on the BUSI dataset, ProtoCAM achieved a macro F1‑score of 0.910 in a 3‑way 5‑shot setting, outperforming standard supervised CNNs, with ResNet18 reaching 91.65% under 15‑shot conditions.

By Ashkan Ebadi
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

MagViT: Interpretable Multi-Magnification Transformers with Patient-Level Model Selection for Breast Histopathology

MagViT is an interpretable multi‑magnification transformer that classifies breast histopathology images by extracting representations from four BreakHis magnifications (40X, 100X, 200X, 400X) and fusing them with a learnable, scale‑gated mechanism that can mask missing scales. The model selects the most accurate architectural branch at the patient level using five‑fold cross‑validation, achieving high performance on BreakHis (mean image accuracy 0.9191, patient accuracy 0.9643, macro‑F1 0.9042) and demonstrating preliminary cross‑dataset generalization on BUSI and IDC. Grad‑CAM visualizations confirm that the network focuses on diagnostically relevant regions across magnifications.

By Nabil Ashab, Soumit Kumar Kundu, Saif Mahmud Parvez, Shahadat Hossain Sohag, Bidhan Biswas, Nazmus Subha
arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 25

Extending the Horizon of Early Diagnosis: Lung Cancer Prediction with Vision Transformers

arXiv:2608.21571v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and early diagnosis is critical for improving survival. However, early-stage...

By Olivera Kotevska, Ian Goethert, Michael McGee, Maria Mahbub, Sean R. Wilkinson, Rowena Yip, Myvizhi Esai Selvan, Zeynep H. Gumus, Claudia Henschke, Robert J. Klein, Providencia Morales, Samuel M Aguayo, Ioana Danciu, Mayanka Chandrashekar
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

Solving the Needle-in-a-Haystack Problem in Mammography Vision-Language Model with Differentiable Subset Sampling

The paper introduces TopKSigLIP, a vision‑language model tailored for mammography that tackles two key challenges: high‑resolution imaging and homogeneous radiology reports. It replaces standard CLIP training with a TopK‑Patch module that selects sparse high‑resolution patches likely to contain lesions, and a Sup‑sigmoid loss that uses soft labels from structured data instead of contrastive loss. TopKSigLIP outperforms existing open‑source mammography and general medical VLMs on zero‑shot tasks such as density assessment, BI‑RADS classification, finding subtyping, and cancer prediction, while also providing better lesion localization than Grad‑CAM.

By Young Seok Jeon, Beatrice Brown-Mulry, Rohan Satya Isaac, Anjana Dissanayaka, Theo Dapamede, Mohammadreza Chavoshi, Judy Gichoya, Hari Trivedi