arXiv AI

How effective are VLMs in assisting humans in inferring the quality of mental models from Multimodal short answers?

arXiv:2603. 00056v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: STEM Mental models can play a critical role in assessing students' conceptual understanding of a topic.

arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 4

VKnowU: Evaluating Visual Knowledge Understanding in Multimodal LLMs

VKnowU is a benchmark that tests multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their grasp of visual knowledge—intuitive, human-like understanding of physical and social principles in videos. The benchmark contains 1,680 questions across 1,249 videos, covering eight core types of visual knowledge, and shows that current state‑of‑the‑art MLLMs still lag behind human performance, especially on world‑centric tasks. To address this gap, the authors release VKnowQA and VideoKnow+, a baseline model that incorporates visual knowledge via a See‑Think‑Answer framework and reinforcement learning, improving performance on VKnowU and related datasets.

By Tianxiang Jiang, Sheng Xia, Yicheng Xu, Linquan Wu, Xiangyu Zeng, Limin Wang, Yu Qiao, Yi Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 5

CURV: Enhancing Chart Understanding Through Curriculum Visual Grounded Reasoning

arXiv:2608. 02833v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Chart question answering (CQA) requires multimodal large language models (MLLMs) to integrate visual comprehension with logical reasoning, yet current models struggle with accurate visual grounding and coherent reasoning chains.

By Xuehang Guo, Pingyue Zhang, Ruiyi Zhang, Zhenhailong Wang, Hanrui Lyu, Heng Ji, Tong Sun, Qingyun Wang, Manling Li
arXiv AI
Aug 12

HSSBench: Benchmarking Humanities and Social Sciences Ability for Multimodal Large Language Models

arXiv:2506. 03922v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated significant potential to advance a broad range of domains.

By Zhaolu Kang, Junhao Gong, Jiaxu Yan, Wanke Xia, Yian Wang, Ziwen Wang, Huaxuan Ding, Zhuo Cheng, Wenhao Cao, Zhiyuan Feng, Siqi He, Shannan Yan, Junzhe Chen, Xiaomin He, Chaoya Jiang, Wei Ye, Kaidong Yu, Xuelong Li
arXiv AI
Jun 11

MentisOculi: Revealing the Limits of Reasoning with Mental Imagery

arXiv:2602. 02465v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Frontier models are transitioning from multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that merely ingest visual information to unified multimodal models (UMMs) capable of native interleaved generation.

By Jana Zeller, Thadd\"aus Wiedemer, Fanfei Li, Thomas Klein, Prasanna Mayilvahanan, Matthias Bethge, Felix Wichmann, Ryan Cotterell, Wieland Brendel
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 24

When Better Teachers Don't Make Better Students: Revisiting Knowledge Distillation for CLIP Models in VQA

arXiv:2511.17886v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable success across multimodal tasks, yet their substantial computational demands hinder ef...

By Pume Tuchinda, Parinthapat Pengpun, Romrawin Chumpu, Patomporn Payoungkhamdee, Sarana Nutanong, Peerat Limkonchotiwat
arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago

MMVistaReason: Toward Open-Data and Post-Training Recipes for Multimodal Reasoning

arXiv:2610.01352v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Open multimodal reasoning models have benefited from large-scale reasoning supervision, yet reliable post-training remains challenging due to uneven da...

By Juekai Lin, Honglin Lin, Yuqian Yuan, Xiaolong Wu, Jie Cao, Liang Liang, Yunqi Cao, Yun Zhu, Wenqiao Zhang, Lijun Wu
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 2

CoMMET: A Psychologically Grounded Benchmark for Evaluating Theory of Mind in Multimodal LLMs

CoMMET is a new multimodal benchmark designed to evaluate Theory of Mind (ToM) in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs). It expands beyond existing text-only, belief-focused tests by covering a wider range of mental states, incorporating moral evaluation, and enabling multi-turn, open-ended interactions. The dataset is grounded in psychological theory and provides a comprehensive assessment across different model families and sizes, revealing strengths, limitations, and future improvement directions.

By Ruirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Kaiwen Wei, Yanzhen Yue, Cheston Tan