The paper introduces Independent–Communicate–Revise (ICR), a framework that isolates communication effects in large language model multi‑agent systems by fixing initial reasoning and measuring how messages influence answer revision. ICR evaluates correction, preservation, and selectivity across four reasoning benchmarks, revealing that similar overall accuracy can mask divergent revision behaviors. The study shows that richer messages can both improve and harm outcomes, and that receiver policies can shift preservation and correction dynamics differently across tasks.
By Shixuan Li, Wei Yang, Peiyu Zhang, Anzhe Cheng, Heng Ping, Paul Bogdan
arXiv:2606. 14211v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLMs are increasingly deployed as agents that interact with external environments and observe feedback such as execution results, error messages, and tool outputs.
By Yinglun Zhu
The paper explores Retrospection-Only Fine-Tuning (ROFT), a method where a language-model agent improves its behavior by generating and training on explanations of its own experiences, without external teachers or reward signals. In software‑engineering tasks with Qwen3.5‑4B, ROFT achieves comparable or better solve rates than GRPO while requiring fewer updates and training time, and can learn from failures alone. Behavioral analysis shows ROFT indirectly assigns credit to actions and can produce shorter, more direct solutions when prompted to focus on direct solutions.
Reflective Recovery is a self‑supervised method that turns failed reasoning attempts into training data, enabling large language models to learn how to correct mistakes during inference. By extracting initial segments of erroneous trajectories and using them as prompts, the approach teaches models to recognize and recover from errors without external critics. Experiments show significant accuracy gains on benchmarks such as AIME 2025 and Minerva, and the method overcomes the scaling collapse problem, fostering emergent self‑correction behaviors.
By Qirui Chen, Renjie Pi, Jiahui Gao, Lingpeng Kong
arXiv:2608. 07931v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large reasoning models (LRMs) are prone to hallucination, which undermines their reliability and poses challenges for safe deployment.
By Zhengze Huang, Luyang Yu, Di Hong, Xinzhe Huang, Wanyu Lin, Zhixuan Chu, Zhan Qin, Tianhang Zheng
The paper introduces REST (REpresentation‑Supervised Thoughts), a new training objective for latent recursive language‑model systems that supplements cross‑entropy loss with differentiable penalties enforcing causality, minimality, separability, and stability of internal thought representations. By applying REST to both single‑agent and multi‑agent setups without changing architectures or adding inference parameters, the authors achieve up to 7.5 percentage‑point gains in accuracy across seven diverse benchmarks and a 30 % improvement in convergence to the final answer. The method also yields more informative latent thoughts, improving interpretability of agent communication.
By Fahd Seddik, Fatemeh Fard
arXiv:2604. 01029v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multi-LLM revision pipelines, in which a second model reviews and improves a draft produced by a first, are widely assumed to derive their gains from genuine error correction.
By Jingjie Ning, Xueqi Li, Chengyu Yu
arXiv:2606. 31478v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Autonomous research agents can now draft hypotheses, write code, run experiments, and produce papers, but they remain brittle when experiments fail.
By Jie Ma, Binfei Chu, Jie Gao, Jinlu Zhang, Yiwei Ma, Yi Tan, Jiayi Ji, Xiaoshuai Sun, Rongrong Ji
arXiv:2607. 12397v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: LLM agents act in external environments where each action changes the state that later decisions condition on, and where a single wrong step can waste interaction budget or trigger irreversible side effects long before the final failure is observed.
By Yaopei Zeng, Congchao Wang, JianHang Chen, Nan Wang, Yurui Chang, Lu Lin
arXiv:2609.05882v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Multi-turn interaction creates a feedback process in which an LLM's previous responses become context for later behavior. Prior work shows substantia...
By Jinnan Li, Zheren Fu, Yue Wang, Jinzhe Li, Yuan Wu, Yi Chang
arXiv:2512.13979v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Large reasoning models achieve strong performance on diverse tasks by producing extended chains of thought. Self-reflection, the ability to review...
By Ge Yan, Chung-En Sun, Linbo Liu, Tsui-Wei Weng
arXiv:2608. 14375v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent reasoning systems often use agreement, confidence, or automated scores to decide which messages should shape a final answer.
By Chih-Hsuan Yang, Anjir Ahmed Chowdhury, Cheng-Hau Yang, Weijian Zheng, Fernando Llorente, Xiaolong Ma, Xinyang Li, Eliu A. Huerta, Ian T. Foster, Rajeev Thakur