arXiv:2607. 24081v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) can assist individuals with limited mobility, such as stroke survivors or amputees.
arXiv:2607. 24126v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Brain-machine interfaces provide a link between neural activity and external devices, enabling restoration of motor function and advancing human-machine interaction using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG).
Brain-machine interfaces provide a link between neural activity and external devices, enabling restoration of motor function and advancing human-machine interaction using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG). However, continuous grasp force decoding remains challenging due to complex temporal dynamics, high inter-subject variability, and limited generalisation of existing approaches.
arXiv:2607. 11530v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decoding continuous three-dimensional (3D) motor imagery (MI) using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain--computer interfaces (BCIs) remains challenging due to signal variability and residual decoding errors.
Decoding continuous three-dimensional (3D) motor imagery (MI) using non-invasive electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain--computer interfaces (BCIs) remains challenging due to signal variability and residual decoding errors. Deep learning architectures such as convolutional neural network--long short-term memory (CNN--LSTM) models can capture spatial and temporal dynamics for continuous kinematic decoding; however, systematic residual errors persist in predicted trajectories.
The paper introduces FRIST, a two‑stage EEG decoding framework that uses fMRI data to learn spectral projections and class geometry, then refines EEG predictions. In experiments with 12 participants, FRIST improves finger‑level motor decoding accuracy across both movement execution and motor imagery tasks, outperforming EEG‑only baselines and generalizing across different EEG backbones. The method demonstrates that fMRI’s spatial resolution can enhance noninvasive EEG‑based BCI performance.
arXiv:2607. 21384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG) models used for epilepsy are often limited to specific datasets and tasks.
arXiv:2607. 04820v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Decoding hand kinematics from surface electromyography (EMG) is a core challenge in wearable biosignal processing with clinical relevance for prosthetic control and motor rehabilitation.
arXiv:2608. 02070v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been widely used in motor rehabilitation, disease diagnosis, and other neural engineering scenarios.
arXiv:2510. 15371v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Classification of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals obtained during motor imagery (MI) has substantial application potential, including communication assistance and rehabilitation support for patients with motor impairments.
arXiv:2608.28967v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Electroencephalography (EEG)-based robotic control is commonly formulated as a direct classification problem, in which electrical neural signals are...
The study investigates whether Low‑Rank Adaptation (LoRA) can adapt three pretrained EEG foundation models—LaBraM‑base, REVE‑base, and REVE‑large—for binary left‑ vs. right‑hand motor imagery decoding in stroke patients. Using subject‑wise five‑fold cross‑validation on the PhysioNet EEG Motor Movement/Imagery Dataset and a binary subset of the UET175 stroke dataset, LoRA significantly improved accuracy for LaBraM‑base (0.822) and REVE‑base (0.957) on the healthy cohort, but only REVE‑base LoRA achieved high performance (0.847±0.194) on stroke data, with a best mean accuracy of 0.952 in leave‑one‑subject‑out evaluation. The results demonstrate that healthy‑benchmark performance does not guarantee transfer to stroke EEG, highlighting the need for target‑domain adaptation and subject‑level assessment in rehabilitation BCIs.
arXiv:2601. 07556v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) face significant deployment challenges due to inter-subject variability, signal non-stationarity, and computational constraints.