arXiv Computation and Language

Where Animacy Lives in Large Language Models: Tracing the Circuits of the Animacy Concept

arXiv AI
Sep 3

Language Models Can Control Their Own Attention

The paper introduces Declarative Attention (DA), a protocol that lets language models explicitly declare which parts of their context to focus on during generation. By partitioning decoding into full-context, region-specific, and recent-output-only modes, the inference engine can skip large portions of the KV cache, dramatically reducing attended tokens. Experiments on 15 long-context tasks with off-the-shelf models show significant savings (52.0% and 31.1% reductions) with only modest accuracy drops that diminish as model size increases.

By Namgyu Ho, Huzama Ahmad, Woosung Koh, Se-Young Yun, Tal Schuster, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 21

Are Linguistic and Arithmetic Circuits Dissociated in LLMs?

The paper investigates whether linguistic and arithmetic tasks in large language models (LLMs) rely on shared neural circuits. Using mechanistic interpretability techniques on five LLMs, the authors find that circuit similarity aligns primarily with task domain rather than input/output vocabularies or syntactic structure. This suggests that LLMs may employ largely separate neural circuits for language and arithmetic, indicating a modular organization of abilities.

By Riku Kisako, Tatsuki Kuribayashi, Ryohei Sasano
arXiv AI
Oct 26

"Not" is Not Lost in Translation: A Causal Analysis of Negation Representations in Multilingual LLMs

The study investigates how multilingual large language models (LLMs) handle negation across languages. Using causal interventions on synthetic and FLORES-200 derived datasets, the authors find that negation representations are causally controllable and largely shared across English, French, Vietnamese, and Chinese. They demonstrate that a single sparse autoencoder feature can control polarity across languages and that these representations generalize to additional languages.

By Giang Son Nguyen, Wray Buntine, Dung D. Le, Wenya Wang
arXiv Computation and Language
Oct 22

Why is AI-generated language so hard to understand?

The paper investigates why AI-generated text has become harder to understand, focusing on psycholinguistic features linked to human processing difficulty such as object relative clauses, long syntactic dependencies, and low-frequency n-grams. Using a new corpus of AI-generated text from diverse domains, the study finds that frontier and near-frontier language models employ these difficult features more frequently than paraphrases from round-trip translation and human writing, including more inanimate subjects with animate verbs, longer dependencies, stacked nouns, and reduced object relatives. The authors hypothesize that AI models prioritize information density for tasks like math, code, and reasoning, diverging from human communication goals, and demonstrate this by fine‑tuning a model with a length penalty, which reduces human‑like linguistic behavior.

By Thomas Hikaru Clark, Matias B. Martin, Kyle Mahowald
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Planting a Latent Variable in Natural-Looking Text: a More Realistic Test of Belief States in LLMs and Their Link to Concept Geometry

The paper introduces a method to embed a controllable latent variable into natural-looking text by steering a teacher LLM along eight sparse autoencoder directions that follow a ring-shaped Markov chain. A small transformer trained on this data successfully tracks the Bayesian posterior of the planted variable and arranges the eight states in the same ring order, linking belief states to concept geometry. This demonstrates that LLMs can model latent variables and that concept geometry may arise from the statistical dynamics of these variables.

By Alexandru-Iulius Jerpelea
arXiv AI
Sep 15

LLM-Microscope: Uncovering the Hidden Role of Punctuation in Context Memory of Transformers

The paper introduces LLM-Microscope, a toolkit for measuring how Large Language Models encode contextual information at the token level. It shows that seemingly minor tokens—such as determiners, stopwords, and punctuation—carry surprisingly high contextual weight, and removing them degrades performance on benchmarks like MMLU and BABILong-4k. The study also finds a strong link between contextualization and linearity, indicating that the transformation between layers can be approximated by a single linear mapping when tokens are well contextualized.

By Anton Razzhigaev, Matvey Mikhalchuk, Temurbek Rahmatullaev, Elizaveta Goncharova, Polina Druzhinina, Ivan Oseledets, Andrey Kuznetsov