arXiv:2606. 05188v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: (Gen)AI diversity is not merely an ethical issue.
arXiv:2606. 05187v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Among the many challenges hindering the responsible development and deployment of AI, arguably none has faced more intense scrutiny than bias in its various forms.
The paper argues that measuring diversity in AI-generated content using a single scalar score is inherently ambiguous and often misleading. It reviews existing diversity metrics, demonstrates their limitations through axiomatic and empirical analyses, and introduces diversity profiles—curve-valued, condition-aware summaries that evaluate diversity across a range of thresholds, scales, exponents, or orders. These profiles reveal whether comparisons are robust across resolutions or depend on arbitrary parameter choices, offering a more transparent framework for generative AI evaluation.
arXiv:2506. 16898v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Diffusion-based text-to-image models are increasingly used for urban analysis and scenario generation, but their geographic knowledge and representational biases remain poorly understood.
arXiv:2512. 15011v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly generates the very content used to train future AI systems.
arXiv:2605. 05627v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Sustainable forest management relies on precise species composition mapping, yet traditional ground surveys are labour-intensive and geographically constrained.
arXiv:2601. 04946v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automatic metrics are widely used to evaluate text-to-image models, often replacing human judgment in benchmarking, model selection, and large-scale data filtering.
The paper introduces a new measure of generative‑process diversity for language models, using Normalised Compression Distance on raw outputs after controlling for permutation effects. Across 38 models, this metric uncovers population structure that semantic similarity misses and predicts lower correlated failures across ten benchmark families, independent of semantic similarity or model capability. The authors argue that higher generative‑process diversity reduces correlated failures in multi‑model systems, offering a practical tool for safety‑relevant applications.
Modern text-to-image models excel in visual fidelity and prompt adherence. However, this strict adherence comes at the cost of diversity: generated samples tend to collapse into a single visual interpretation.
The paper investigates how long, richly detailed prompts cause modern text-to-image models to lose diversity, even when many visual aspects are unspecified. It introduces PromptMoG, a training‑free method that samples prompt embeddings from a Mixture‑of‑Gaussians distribution to restore diversity while preserving semantic fidelity. The authors also present LPD‑Bench, a benchmark for evaluating fidelity and diversity under long, semantically dense prompts, and demonstrate PromptMoG’s effectiveness on four large diffusion models.
arXiv:2508. 03483v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: While prior research on text-to-image generation has predominantly focused on biases in human depictions, demographic bias in generated objects remains relatively underexplored.
arXiv:2411. 02817v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative models guided by text prompts are widely evaluated for fidelity and prompt alignment, yet their ability to produce outputs remains underexplored.
arXiv:2606. 28510v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Across social and online platforms, people are increasingly exposed to AI-generated images.