arXiv:2606. 05187v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Among the many challenges hindering the responsible development and deployment of AI, arguably none has faced more intense scrutiny than bias in its various forms.
Machine-generated by The Flow from the publisher's headline and feed description — not written or checked by a human. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2606. 05188v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: (Gen)AI diversity is not merely an ethical issue.
arXiv:2412. 08610v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Recent evidence, both in the lab and in the wild, suggests that the use of generative artificial intelligence reduces the diversity of content produced.
arXiv:2512. 15011v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly generates the very content used to train future AI systems.
The paper argues that measuring diversity in AI-generated content using a single scalar score is inherently ambiguous and often misleading. It reviews existing diversity metrics, demonstrates their limitations through axiomatic and empirical analyses, and introduces diversity profiles—curve-valued, condition-aware summaries that evaluate diversity across a range of thresholds, scales, exponents, or orders. These profiles reveal whether comparisons are robust across resolutions or depend on arbitrary parameter choices, offering a more transparent framework for generative AI evaluation.
arXiv:2605. 04127v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Model collapse, the degradation in performance that arises when generative models are trained on the outputs of prior models, is an increasing concern as artificially generated content proliferates.
arXiv:2410. 12341v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: As AI-generated content increasingly populates the web, generative AI models are at growing risk of being trained on their own outputs, a process known as AI autophagy.