arXiv:2411. 02817v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative models guided by text prompts are widely evaluated for fidelity and prompt alignment, yet their ability to produce outputs remains underexplored.
Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.
arXiv:2608. 17731v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Diversity is a fundamental criterion for evaluating generative artificial intelligence (AI) systems, yet its measurement remains inherently ambiguous.
arXiv:2608. 09385v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI models are primarily designed to imitate the data distribution, an objective that neither corrects diversity lost by a learned generator nor defines how generation should extend beyond the diversity of the data itself.
Generative AI models are primarily designed to imitate the data distribution, an objective that neither corrects diversity lost by a learned generator nor defines how generation should extend beyond the diversity of the data itself. We introduce Imaginative Generative AI (IGA), a framework that makes diversity part of the target-distribution design problem: among distributions close to a reference, IGA selects one whose spectral diversity reaches a prescribed level.
arXiv:2606. 01811v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Measuring the diversity of creative outputs is central to evaluating post-training mode collapse, comparing decoding strategies, and quantifying creative behavior in both AI and human writing.
arXiv:2606. 31407v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models can produce confident answers on visually ambiguous inputs, resulting in biased predictions.
arXiv:2501. 18897v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Generative models have achieved remarkable success across a range of applications, yet their evaluation still lacks principled uncertainty quantification.