arXiv AI

FACT: Failure-Aware Causal Training for World-Action Models

arXiv:2608. 10232v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recent world-action models (WAMs) show that co-training policies with future prediction can provide physical priors for action generation.

arXiv Computer Vision
Aug 26

Do Robotic World Models Really Follow Actions? Diagnosing and Aligning Action-Conditioned Generation for Policy Learning

arXiv:2608.24885v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Action-conditioned world models are increasingly used as learned simulators for policy evaluation and improvement, yet their effectiveness rests on a...

By Sixiang Chen, Jiaming Liu, Jixian Wu, Yichen Guo, Tinghao Wang, Siyuan Qian, Hao Chen, Jiajun Cao, Jian Tang, Shanghang Zhang
arXiv AI
Sep 25

AD-WM: Action-Discriminative World Models for Counterfactual Model Predictive Control

AD-WM is a new action‑discriminative joint‑embedding world model designed for counterfactual model predictive control. It augments residual latent dynamics with action‑recovery regularization based on inverse dynamics and conditional mutual information, while discarding auxiliary heads at test time so that MPC remains unchanged. Experiments on OGBench‑Cube and other simulation environments show substantial gains in hard‑start success and mean success, and zero‑shot transfer to a Franka robot improves pick‑and‑place success from 42.2% to 71.1%.

By Jiabin Qiu, Zixuan Chen, Hongye Cao, Jieqi Shi, Jing Huo, Yang Gao
arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

Track-and-Complete: Learning Humanoid Skills from a Single Failed Human Video

The paper introduces TRACC, a pipeline that learns humanoid skills from a single failed human video by first imitating the usable portion of the motion trajectory and then completing the task based on the inferred outcome. It treats the motion prefix before failure as prior knowledge and uses a task-completion reward to guide learning toward the intended goal without needing a successful demonstration. The method is evaluated on six failed tasks from the Oops! dataset, showing its effectiveness in learning from failures.

By Sarmad Idrees, Jongeun Choi
arXiv Computer Vision
4d ago

EVO-WAM: Evolving World Action Models through Video-Action Verification

arXiv:2609.38057v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Improving robot policies on new tasks without collecting additional expert demonstrations remains a central challenge in robot learning. World action m...

By Shiyang Zhou, Xionghao Wu, Wenbo Li, Shenghe Zheng, Jiyao Zhang, Songsong Yu, Yijun Yang, Jianhui Liu, Haoze Sun, Senqiao Yang, Li Jiang, Jingyong Su, Haoyang Huang, Zhuotao Tian
arXiv AI
3d ago

Learning Skills from Historical Action Trajectories: Action Experience Dictionary for World Action Models

arXiv:2609.40219v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: World Action Models (WAMs) couple visual dynamics prediction with action generation, yet they do not explicitly support the reuse of action experienc...

By Qi Lyu, Jiahua Dong, Hao Shen, Xudong Wang, Hongyuan Yu, Baichen Liu, Henghui Ding, Zhi Han, Nicu Sebe, Ivan Laptev, Fahad Shahbaz Khan, Salman Khan
arXiv Computer Vision
2d ago

CtrlWAM: Controllable World Action Models with Aligned Intent and Foresight

CtrlWAM introduces a controllable world action model that jointly predicts actions (intent) and visual futures (foresight). By executing perturbed actions in a simulator and pairing them with noised visual outcomes, it aligns action predictions with their visual consequences, using warped video–action noise schedules to maintain visual layout responsiveness. The model extends beyond ego‑only control to multiple agent streams, improving action forecasts, video–action agreement, and command following in driving and robotics experiments.

By Chensheng Peng, Wenhao Ding, Ran Tian, Zewei Zhou, Jef Packer, Maximilian Igl, Peter Karkus, Yan Wang, Masayoshi Tomizuka, Boris Ivanovic, Marco Pavone, Yuxiao Chen
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 16

World-Action Models for Robot Learning and Control: A Survey

The survey "World-Action Models for Robot Learning and Control" reviews recent advances in coupling future world prediction with executable action generation for robots in open environments. It clarifies the scope of World-Action Models (WAMs) relative to conventional world models, model-based RL, and Vision‑Language‑Action policies, and organizes existing methods through a unified taxonomy covering representations, transition modeling, action interfaces, architectures, training pipelines, data modalities, and scaling strategies. The paper also surveys applications in manipulation, navigation, and autonomous driving, summarizes datasets, benchmarks, and metrics, and discusses key challenges such as action alignment, spatial consistency, long‑horizon memory, and efficient inference.

By Zuxing Lu, Hongjia Zhai, Guanzhi Wang, Huajian Zeng, Jiaqi Yang, Jingyu Liu, Lei Cheng, Yuantai Zhang, Yuheng Qiu, Zezhou Cheng, Ivan Laptev, Danfei Xu, Benjamin Riviere, Giuseppe Loianno, Eric Xing, Xingxing Zuo