arXiv Machine Learning

Unifying Information-Theoretic and Pair-Counting Clustering Similarity

arXiv:2511. 03000v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Comparing clusterings is central to evaluating unsupervised models, yet the many existing similarity measures can produce widely divergent, sometimes contradictory, evaluations.

arXiv Machine Learning
Jun 19

Variational Consensus Monte Carlo for Bayesian Mixture

arXiv:2606. 19643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Motivated by the privacy, sensitivity and sharing limitations of health data, we present a comprehensive pipeline for inference of Bayesian mixture models within a federated learning setting, i.

By Julie Fendler, Francesca L. Crowe, Tom Marshall, Sylvia Richardson, Paul D. W. Kirk
arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 22

Revisiting Lexicon Evaluation in Unsupervised Word Discovery

The paper critiques the normalized edit distance metric used for evaluating lexicons derived from unsupervised word discovery, noting its bias toward large clusters and its failure to account for the distribution of true classes across clusters. It proposes two new metrics—one that weights cluster size when measuring within‑cluster consistency and another that evaluates how true words are spread across clusters—drawing on clustering theory. Experiments on synthetic and real‑world lexicons show that these combined metrics better correlate with ground‑truth distributions and are more robust to evaluation biases.

By Simon Malan, Danel Slabbert, Herman Kamper