Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance. Existing evaluation practices rely heavily on task-specific metrics or small-scale manual verification, offering limited insight into the structural and semantic fidelity of extracted graphs.
arXiv:2607. 10212v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are increasingly constructed through automated extraction pipelines; however, such systems often introduce spurious or incomplete triples, which degrade downstream performance.
By Nipun Misra, Vikranth Udandarao, Aanchal Gupta, Yogender Kumar, Manuj Mukherjee, Raghava Mutharaju
arXiv:2511.04473v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Retrieval of information from graph-structured knowledge bases represents a promising direction for improving the factuality of LLMs. While various...
By Alberto Cattaneo, Carlo Luschi, Daniel Justus
arXiv:2606. 14047v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Long-context language modeling requires not only extending context windows but maintaining coherent understanding of entity states and relationships across thousands of tokens -- a challenge that semantic similarity alone cannot address.
By Ghadir Alselwi, Basem Suleiman, Hao Xue, Shoaib Jameel, Hakim Hacid, Flora D. Salim, Imran Razzak
arXiv:2506.05626v3 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: Real-world knowledge can take various forms, including structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data. Among these, Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are...
By Xiaohua Lu, Liubov Tupikina, Mehwish Alam
The paper introduces AVA, a framework that tests whether general NLP embeddings can differentiate logic-sensitive relational semantics in ontologies and knowledge graphs. AVA uses 171,007 contrastive triplets from 163 ontologies, each containing an ontology statement, a paraphrase, and a hard negative with contradictory meaning. Evaluation of over 25 embedding models shows significant limitations, with the best model achieving only 0.739 triplet accuracy and 0.135 for hard negatives; fine‑tuning helps but does not transfer well to downstream Semantic Web tasks.
By Hamed Babaei Giglou, Jennifer D'Souza, S\"oren Auer