arXiv:2606. 00643v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) often train slowly or fail to converge on challenging partial differential equations (PDEs), a behavior recently linked to severely ill-conditioned loss landscapes inherited from the underlying differential operator.
By Nathanael Tepakbong, Hanyu Hu, Chengyu Liu, Xiang Zhou
arXiv:2607. 02194v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising route to solve partial differential equations, yet they have struggled to reach the precision of classical solvers.
By Joseph Webb, Sadok Jerad, Coralia Cartis
arXiv:2606. 09923v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural operators such as the Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) have emerged as powerful surrogates for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), achieving speedups of several orders of magnitude over traditional numerical solvers.
By Michael Chin
Physics-Informed Conformal Prediction (PI‑CP) embeds PDE residuals into the nonconformity score of split conformal prediction, yielding distribution‑free prediction intervals with provable coverage that adapt spatially to physics violations. The method demonstrates consistent 89‑91% coverage across six physics scenarios, outperforming MC Dropout and Deep Ensembles, while Fourier Neural Operators (FNO) achieve superior accuracy over CNN and DeepONet. Additionally, the authors prove that FNO’s translation equivariance limits its ability to solve PDEs with Dirichlet boundary conditions, and show that adding coordinate channels can reduce error by up to 63×.
By Michael Chin
arXiv:2609. 16406v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Machine learning-based partial differential equations (PDEs) solvers have attracted significant attention in recent years.
By Chi-An Chen, Chunyang Liao, Ming Zhong
arXiv:2609.24947v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Neural operators evaluate parametric partial differential equations cheaply but degrade sharply outside their training distribution. Physics-informed n...
By S. Mohammad Mousavi, Teeratorn Kadeethum, Nikolaos Bouklas, Somdatta Goswami
arXiv:2605. 08318v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We study the problem of \emph{architecture selection} for deep learning models trained to solve partial differential equations (PDEs), asking when transformer-based architectures with learned attention outperform Fourier-domain neural operators.
By Brandon Yee, Pairie Koh, Jack Rodriguez, Mihir Tekal
arXiv:2607. 15702v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We prove a finite-sample formulation gap for physics-informed learning of nonlinear multiscale elliptic equations.
By Ronald Katende
arXiv:2606. 24999v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) with unknown coefficients arise widely in scientific machine learning, including continuous-time reinforcement learning, yet solving them efficiently in a data-driven way remains challenging.
By Yanwei Jia, Du Ouyang, Huy\^en Pham, Xun Yu Zhou
arXiv:2605. 23391v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for coupled multiphysics systems suffer systematic accuracy degradation as inter-equation coupling strengthens.
By Youngjae Park, Jaemin Kim, Junghwa Hong
arXiv:2607. 15702v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We develop a non-asymptotic approximation, sampling, and finite-iteration optimization theory for variational physics-informed approximation of uniformly monotone nonlinear multiscale elliptic equations.
By Ronald Katende
The paper introduces S$^{2}$-PINN, a stochastic separable physics-informed neural network that models the solution of random partial differential equations using a learnable Gaussian spatial dictionary, Fourier temporal features, and a generalized polynomial chaos stochastic basis linked by a low-rank Canonical Polyadic tensor core. Training employs a hybrid strong-form and gPC-projected residual loss, and theoretical analysis shows the separable class is dense in $L^2$ and that the projected residual matches a stochastic Galerkin constraint. Experiments on four manufactured benchmarks and additional Poisson, Darcy, Navier–Stokes, and inverse problems demonstrate that S$^{2}$-PINN achieves higher mean and variance accuracy, better calibration, and fewer parameters than nine baselines, supporting stochastic separability as an effective design principle for physics-informed neural UQ.
By Zhendong Li, Akwum Onwunta