arXiv:2609. 23529v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as powerful surrogates for solving partial differential equations (PDEs), yet their reliability under distribution shift remains a critical barrier to deployment.
arXiv:2512. 09165v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets) have emerged as a powerful framework for data-driven operator learning, providing flexible surrogates for nonlinear mappings arising in partial differential equations (PDEs).
arXiv:2605. 08170v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Neural operators have emerged as a powerful tool for learning mappings between infinite-dimensional function spaces.
arXiv:2606. 02427v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing evaluations of neural operators and in-context operator learning rely primarily on prediction error, but accurate output prediction does not guarantee the correct local dynamical structure.
arXiv:2602. 09530v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We introduce AutoSpec, a neural network framework for discovering iterative spectral algorithms for large-scale numerical linear algebra and numerical optimization.
arXiv:2609. 18901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In physics-informed machine learning, a target function $u^*$ is learned from noisy value observations $y_i=u^*(x_i)+ \varepsilon_i$, together with differential information, given either by noisy observations $d_j=(Du^*)(z_j)+\xi_j$ or by a known physical constraint $Du^*=v$.
The paper investigates how many linear samples are needed to learn Lipschitz operators under Gaussian measures. It establishes both lower and upper bounds on the Hermite polynomial approximation error and shows that the minimal worst‑case error cannot converge algebraically with the number of samples. However, if the covariance operator of the Gaussian measure decays rapidly, convergence rates arbitrarily close to any algebraic rate can be achieved.
arXiv:2606. 30230v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Learned reconstruction operators for inverse problems are typically trained under a fixed noise model, and generalize poorly when the distribution during testing differs from the one assumed during training.
arXiv:2608. 11019v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Modeling spatiotemporal dynamical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs) poses two major challenges: it either requires expensive physics-based simulators that entail iterative numerical solving at high computational cost, or it depends on abundant training data, yet purely data-driven models often generalize poorly to downstream dynamic operating conditions.
arXiv:2606. 24999v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs) with unknown coefficients arise widely in scientific machine learning, including continuous-time reinforcement learning, yet solving them efficiently in a data-driven way remains challenging.
arXiv:2606. 17460v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Neural operators are widely used as surrogate solution maps for partial differential equations (PDEs), but full-size models can be costly to store, deploy, and evaluate in many-query scientific workflows.
Existing evaluations of neural operators and in-context operator learning rely primarily on prediction error, but accurate output prediction does not guarantee the correct local dynamical structure. A model may match solutions while exhibiting incorrect sensitivities, distorted frequency response, spurious mode coupling, or unstable tangent behavior.
The paper studies operator learning on function spaces using encoder–decoder architectures. It shows that as input and output resolutions grow, the induced kernels converge to a limiting kernel, enabling regularity assumptions independent of resolution. The authors derive upper and lower bounds for regularized stochastic gradient descent, extend the analysis to neural networks via the limiting neural tangent kernel, and provide error bounds and complexity guarantees for various kernel and encoding constructions.