arXiv:2607. 16235v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Mobile and wearable devices offer an unprecedented opportunity for continuous, passive health monitoring and active health coaching.
By Narayan Schuetz, Yuze Bai, Lianggang Pan, Edgar Eggert, Favour Nerrise, Juan Delgado-SanMartin, Max Rosenblattl, Milana Gurbanova, Mohammad Asadi, Anders Johnson, Paul Schmiedmayer, Dennis Wang, Allan Lawrie, Daniel Seung Kim, Xin Liu, Akshay Paruchuri, Ehsan Adeli, Euan Ashley, Kelly W. Zhang
arXiv:2607. 27635v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wearable sensors continuously capture fine-grained multivariate time-series data, providing opportunities to model behavioural patterns associated with health outcomes.
By Xiaotong Yu, Joshua Y. Kim, HaeJin Lee, Kalina Yacef
arXiv:2606. 14604v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Wearable devices and smartphones generate rich behavioural time series that can support proactive health interventions, yet systematic comparisons of modern forecasting architectures for these data are lacking.
By Pavlos Nicolaou, Kleanthis Malialis, Artemis Kontou, Panayiotis Kolios
BALMS is a benchmark for evaluating large language model (LLM) agents that analyze longitudinal wearable data to predict mental‑health wellbeing scores and generate evidence‑grounded rationales. It covers three real‑world datasets, two task families (score prediction and rationale generation), and tests five LLM backbones across open‑ and closed‑source paradigms. The study finds that zero‑shot agents rarely beat a simple mean baseline, and while chain‑of‑thought prompting helps reasoning, it does not ensure temporal grounding or numerical accuracy.
By Yu Yvonne Wu, Arvind Pillai, Yuliang Chen, Yuwei Zhang, Sudarshan Regmi, Tess Z. Griffin, Michael V. Heinz, Lisa A. Marsch, Nicholas C. Jacobson, Andrew Campbell
WearableQA is a new benchmark that tests AI systems on health reasoning using real-world wearable data from 200 users, each with up to 500 days of daily measurements. It contains 4,084 ten‑option multiple‑choice questions derived from wearable time series, blood biomarkers, and demographics, and is organized into 16 question types that distinguish data‑driven computation from physiological interpretation and single‑signal from cross‑signal reasoning. Evaluation of 14 large language models shows wide performance gaps, indicating that the benchmark remains challenging and useful for diagnosing model capabilities.
By Ji Soo Lee, Xilun Chen, Pierce Chuang, Ashish Shenoy, Jason Wei, Dohwan Ko, Hyunwoo J. Kim, Benoit Corda
arXiv:2606. 24985v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Personalization in wearable-based stress detection remains challenging due to substantial inter-individual variability in physiological and behavioral responses.
By Louis Simon, Mohamed Chetouani