arXiv Machine Learning

Procedural Knowledge Is Not Low-Rank: Why LoRA Fails to Internalize Multi-Step Procedures

arXiv:2607. 21612v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods like LoRA have become the default for adapting large language models, succeeding across instruction following, style transfer, and factual adaptation.

arXiv AI
Sep 15

LoRA Fine-Tuned Models for Control Systems Course Q\&A: A Multidimensional Evaluation of Model Scale and Rank Effects

The paper presents a study on fine‑tuning open‑source instruction‑tuned language models for a Linear Control Systems course using LoRA. A dataset of 360 system‑user‑assistant conversations was created, and LoRA was applied to Qwen2.5‑3B‑Instruct and Qwen2.5‑7B‑Instruct with ranks r=4, 8, and 16. Evaluation with ROUGE, BERTScore, and structured‑output metrics showed that LoRA improved similarity and stability, with the 7B‑r16 model achieving the highest scores and r=8 offering a good trade‑off between performance and parameter efficiency.

By Shaowen Lu, Chengxu Liu, Ping Zhou, Tao Yang
arXiv Machine Learning
5d ago

New LoRA Skills Should Read but Never Write

The paper introduces READ, a method for composing low‑rank adapters (LoRA) in large language models. By rewriting each adapter into a balanced canonical form and enforcing a one‑directional coupling, READ allows new skills to read but never write into the output subspaces of existing skills, eliminating interference. Experiments on four benchmark suites and two model families show that READ consistently outperforms existing baselines, improving SuperGLUE scores by over twenty points and domain suite scores by more than seven points.

By Zeyan Li, Panqi Yang, Qirong Guo, Shengda Zhuo, SIyuan Qiu, Hu Xu, Chun Li, Jianfeng Xu
arXiv AI
Jun 6

LatentSkill: From In-Context Textual Skills to In-Weight Latent Skills for LLM Agents

arXiv:2606. 06087v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Agent systems increasingly use textual skills to encode reusable task procedures, but injecting these skills into the prompt at every step incurs substantial context overhead and exposes skill content as plaintext.

By Aofan Yu, Chenyu Zhou, Tianyi Xu, Zihan Guo, Rong Shan, Zhihui Fu, Jun Wang, Weiwen Liu, Yong Yu, Weinan Zhang, Jianghao Lin
arXiv AI
Sep 25

The Fellowship of the Query: Learning Retrieval Actions

The paper investigates how trajectory fine‑tuning can enhance small language models (SLMs) as next‑action controllers in retrieval‑augmented question answering. By building a seven‑way action‑prediction task from teacher search traces, the authors fine‑tune SLMs and cross‑lingual SLMs (xSLMs) using LoRA and evaluate on 1,646 held‑out examples, achieving a macro‑F1 of 0.6536 with Granite 4.1 3B. In an end‑to‑end controller/generator swap experiment on 149 trajectories, the fine‑tuned model improves Exact Match from 0.7530 to 0.7946 and token F1 from 0.7783 to 0.8295, demonstrating that trajectory supervision boosts action prediction and evidence‑recording behavior.

By Mohammed Al-Maamari, Saber Zerhoudi, Michael Granitzer, Jelena Mitrovi\'c
arXiv AI
Sep 10

Procedural Graphs: Self-Evolving Execution Structures for LLM Agents

The paper introduces Procedural Graphs, a framework that structures procedural knowledge for large language model agents as (procedure, relation, procedure) triplets, analogous to knowledge graphs for factual data. At each decision point, a guidance model uses the local subgraph to bias the agent’s next action, while an LLM refiner self‑evolves the graph by comparing failed and successful trajectories, editing its topology to improve performance. Experiments across various datasets, tasks, and LLMs show that Procedural Graphs consistently outperform memory‑based baselines, and the self‑evolution mechanism further enhances results without manual engineering.

By Yuxing Lu, Yicheng Chen, Shanchan Wu, Sercan \"{O}. Ar{\i}k
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jun 10

SkillJuror: Measuring How Agent Skill Organization Changes Runtime Behavior

Agent Skills augment large language model (LLM) agents with procedural knowledge at inference time, but current benchmarks rarely distinguish what a Skill says from how it is organized. We study this distinction through Progressive Disclosure, where a concise root file points agents to supporting resources on demand, and compare it with a normalized flat baseline.