arXiv:2602. 12952v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Adapting large pre-trained models to downstream tasks often produces task-specific parameter updates that are expensive to relearn for every model variant.
By Filippo Rinaldi, Aniello Panariello, Giacomo Salici, Angelo Porrello, Simone Calderara
arXiv:2606. 01503v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Unified vision-language models (VLMs) integrate visual understanding and visual generation within a single autoregressive backbone, but their joint training is computationally expensive and largely overlooked from an efficiency perspective.
By Siyi Chen, Weiming Zhuang, Jingtao Li, Lingjuan Lv
arXiv:2606. 22589v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Ever since the advent of foundation models and the pre-training-finetuning paradigm, there have been numerous efforts to merge multiple task-specific experts into a single multi-task model.
By Jungyong Son, Jinwook Jung, Sungyong Baik
The paper introduces a method for selecting the best vision‑language model for a downstream task by analyzing the internal dynamics of the visual encoder. It represents each task with layer‑wise conductance and uses an entropy‑regularized alignment to derive a target‑conditioned block importance distribution. The proposed Directional Conductance Divergence (DCD) metric captures asymmetric transferability, enabling accurate prediction of model rankings without direct inference, and achieves a 14.7% NDCG@5 improvement over SWAB on 48 VLMs across 21 datasets.
By Wei Yang, Hong Xie, Tao Tan, Xin Li, Defu Lian, Enhong Chen
arXiv:2510. 17426v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: The "alignment tax" of post-training is typically framed as a drop in task accuracy.
By Tiancheng Hu, Benjamin Minixhofer, Nigel Collier
arXiv:2608. 06901v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable generalization across diverse multimodal tasks through large-scale pre-training, yet their rapidly increasing computational and memory requirements pose significant challenges for deployment in constrained environments.
By Minseok Kang, Hyunwoo Kim, Chanyoung Kim, Minwoo Kim, Jaekoo Lee, Dahuin Jung
arXiv:2607. 16294v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Paired image-to-image translation underpins a wide range of computer vision tasks, including image editing, sensor translation, and domain adaptation.
By Aimi Okabayashi (UBS Vannes), Georges Le Bellier (LIP, CEDRIC - VERTIGO), Nicolas Audebert (LaSTIG, IGN, CEDRIC - VERTIGO), Charlotte Pelletier (OBELIX), Thomas Corpetti (LETG - Rennes), Nicolas Courty (OBELIX)
arXiv:2603. 00198v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Token reduction accelerates long-video vision--language models (VLMs), but existing methods target Transformers, where reduction is treated as token pruning.
By Jindong Jiang, Amala Sanjay Deshmukh, Kateryna Chumachenko, Karan Sapra, Zhiding Yu, Guilin Liu, Andrew Tao, Pavlo Molchanov, Jan Kautz, Wonmin Byeon
arXiv:2606. 08156v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision Transformers (ViTs) achieve strong performance but suffer from high computational costs due to quadratic self-attention complexity.
By Kyumin Choi, Ikbeom Jang
arXiv:2606. 16799v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing vision-language model (VLM)-based AI-generated image quality assessment (AIGIQA) methods suffer from a fundamental semantic-distortion dimensional conflict: monolithic representations optimized for semantic discrimination inherently entangle compositional understanding with low-level perceptual sensitivity, rendering them blind to fine-grained quality degradations.
By Zijie Meng
The paper introduces a new multi‑task model‑merging framework that tackles task interference by projecting task vectors into a high‑dimensional sparse feature space using Sparse Autoencoders, enabling feature‑level disentanglement before fusion. It also proposes a lightweight Group‑Ranked Zeroth‑Order Optimizer to identify task‑critical layers for selective merging, reducing computational overhead. Experiments on Qwen2.5‑1.5B and Qwen2.5‑7B show consistent performance gains over several baselines across reasoning, code generation, instruction following, and general knowledge tasks, with a 2.78% improvement in a highly conflicting four‑task setting.
By Yihang Zhang, Shengke Sun, Junjie Wen, Feng Zeng
Multi-task model merging aims to consolidate several task-specific experts into a unified model, yet static merging consistently suffers from parameter interference. While dynamic merging models aim to bridge this gap, many works rely on the costly storage and loading of redundant expert components at inference.