arXiv AI

Model Specific Task Similarity for Vision Language Model Selection via Layer Conductance

The paper introduces a method for selecting the best vision‑language model for a downstream task by analyzing the internal dynamics of the visual encoder. It represents each task with layer‑wise conductance and uses an entropy‑regularized alignment to derive a target‑conditioned block importance distribution. The proposed Directional Conductance Divergence (DCD) metric captures asymmetric transferability, enabling accurate prediction of model rankings without direct inference, and achieves a 14.7% NDCG@5 improvement over SWAB on 48 VLMs across 21 datasets.

arXiv AI
Aug 20

From Inference to Adaptation: A Unified Optimal Transport View of Vision Language Model

arXiv:2608. 18339v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated remarkable zero-shot capabilities yet remain sensitive to real-world distribution shifts during inference.

By Qi Yu, Zhichen Zeng, Katherine Tieu, Xiyuan Yang, Ruizhong Qiu, Yuchen Yan, Lihui Liu, Yanjun Zhao, Lingjie Chen, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong
arXiv AI
Jun 16

Beyond Scalar Distances: Semantic Attribute Gradients from Frozen MLLMs for Visual Embeddings

arXiv:2606. 15134v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Vision encoders for retrieval are typically trained with class-label supervision: each training pair reduces to a scalar that uniformly pushes the embedding apart or pulls it together, as if every visual attribute either differed or matched.

By Shubhang Bhatnagar, Dheeraj Baiju, Narendra Ahuja
arXiv AI
Aug 28

Subspace Alignment for Vision-Language Model Test-time Adaptation

The paper introduces SubTTA, a test-time adaptation method for vision‑language models that aligns the semantic subspaces of visual and textual modalities to improve zero‑shot predictions. It addresses two issues: the modality gap caused by distribution shifts and visual nuisance that masks task‑specific semantics. By minimizing chordal distance between principal subspaces and projecting visual features onto a task‑specific textual subspace, SubTTA refines decision boundaries and achieves an average 2.24% improvement over existing TTA methods.

By Zhichen Zeng, Wenxuan Bao, Xiao Lin, Ruizhong Qiu, Tianxin Wei, Xuying Ning, Yuchen Yan, Chen Luo, Monica Xiao Cheng, Jingrui He, Hanghang Tong
arXiv Computation and Language
Aug 28

Visual Information-Guided Parallel Decoding for Diffusion Multimodal Large Language Models

Visual Information-Guided Parallel Decoding for Diffusion Multimodal Large Language Models introduces the VIG‑Sampler, a method that prioritizes tokens for decoding based on their attention to image tokens and penalizes redundancy in image‑attention distributions. The approach aims to improve the quality of multimodal generation by selecting more informative tokens during diffusion decoding. Experiments on seven captioning and VQA benchmarks with three open‑source dMLLMs show that VIG‑Sampler outperforms the Info‑Gain Sampler by an average of 19.3 CIDEr points and achieves better COCO Caption results using only half as many decoding steps.

By Insu Lee, Wooje Park, Wonseok Shin, Jinwoo Son, Byonghyo Shim
arXiv Computer Vision
Sep 11

Task Alignment: A Simple Proxy for Practical Model Merging Across Diverse Vision Tasks

The paper introduces the task alignment proxy, a method that accelerates hyperparameter selection for merging models fine‑tuned on diverse vision tasks. It addresses the challenge of training heterogeneous decoders, which makes traditional downstream performance evaluation costly. By using the proxy, the authors demonstrate that model merging can be applied efficiently to multi‑task vision models beyond CLIP‑based classification.

By Pau de Jorge, C\'esar Roberto de Souza, Bj\"orn Michele, Mert B\"ulent Sar{\i}y{\i}ld{\i}z, Philippe Weinzaepfel, Florent Perronnin, Diane Larlus, Yannis Kalantidis
arXiv AI
Jun 24

Evaluating the Interpretability of Sparse Autoencoders with Concept Annotations

arXiv:2606. 24716v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are increasingly used to extract interpretable concepts from vision and vision language models, yet existing evaluation methods largely rely on proxy metrics or qualitative inspection rather than measuring semantic correspondence.

By Jonas Klotz, Cassio F. Dantas, Pallavi Jain, Diego Marcos, Beg\"um Demir
arXiv AI
Jun 24

When Language Overwrites Vision: Over-Alignment and Geometric Debiasing in Vision-Language Models

arXiv:2605. 08245v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) increasingly power high-stakes applications, from medical imaging to autonomous systems, yet they routinely hallucinate, confidently describing content not present in the input.

By Harshvardhan Saini, Samyak Jha, Yiming Tang, Dianbo Liu