CheXPoT is a post‑hoc visual verification framework that refines vision‑language model (VLM) generated chest radiograph reports by decomposing them into predicates, grounding each against DenseNet‑121 and Grad‑CAM evidence, and removing unsupported findings. On a held‑out set of 4,145 images, CheXPoT significantly improves precision and F1 scores across multiple CheXpert classes, boosting micro‑average precision from 19.2 % to 46.8 % and micro‑average F1 from 23.0 % to 49.4 %. The method also enhances performance for other VLM generators such as LLaVA‑Med and MAIRA‑2, demonstrating that inexpensive visual verification can correct hallucinations and improve report quality.
By Joey Guo, Rayan Ansari, Alaa Youssef
arXiv:2607. 25589v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical-imaging AI benchmarks combine datasets, DICOM rendering, prompts, provider APIs, automated labels, statistical code, manuscripts, and repository releases.
By Mateusz Koz{\l}owski
arXiv:2609.26093v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Vision-language models can answer spatial relation questions confidently even when the image supports an incompatible relation. We formulate relation-g...
By Feixiang Liu, Qiang Qiu, Qingyang Li, Hui Xu
arXiv:2607. 27069v2 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Closed yes/no spatial benchmarks can reward a correct answer even when the image adds little support beyond no-image contexts.
By Feixiang Liu, Qiang Qiu, Lanbo Sun, Nan Wei, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
arXiv:2604.25213v2 Announce Type: replace
Abstract: OpenAI's GPT-Image-2 has effectively erased the visual boundary between authentic and AI-edited document images: a single number on a receipt can b...
By Jiaqi Wu, Yuchen Zhou, Dennis Tsang Ng, Xingyu Shen, Kidus Zewde, Ankit Raj, Tommy Duong, Simiao Ren
arXiv:2606. 17710v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language models report strong chest radiograph accuracy, and this is increasingly read as evidence that they use the image.
By Mahshad Lotfinia, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Lisa Adams, Daniel Truhn, Andreas Maier, Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh
arXiv:2609.13308v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: A companion evaluation found that naming the target part in a manipulation prompt increased action accuracy by 0.32-0.63 across eight vision-language...
By Sarthak Sattigeri
arXiv:2509. 22415v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved strong vision-language performance, yet their token-level visual evidence remains difficult to inspect.
By Jiawei Liang, Jianjie Huang, Ruoyu Chen, Xianghao Jiao, Siyuan Liang, Shiming Liu, Xiaochun Cao
arXiv:2608. 13267v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Existing vision-language model (VLM) benchmarks emphasize perception and reasoning accuracy (how well VLMs describe and reason about what they see in an image), with limited attention to behavioral reliability under uncertainty (how they behave when visual evidence is missing or misleading).
By Paul Osemudiame Oamen, Owusu-Banahene Osei, Ananya Mukherjee, Christian Greisinger, Steffen Eger, Pius Onobhayedo, Wei Zhao
VisionQ is a new benchmark for qualitative analysis in computer vision that evaluates vision‑language models (VLMs) on criterion‑conditioned visual discrimination. It is built from over 1,800 peer‑reviewed comparison figures in CVPR and ICCV papers, linking each image crop to author‑stated visual claims through 3,911 hand‑annotated data points. The benchmark includes a 51‑leaf taxonomy of visual criteria, a protocol that hides method identities and reports accuracy per criterion, and a DPO‑tuned Gemma‑4‑E4B judge that improves accuracy on a held‑out test set.
By Vu Dinh Xuan, Duc-Hai Nguyen, Minh-Dung Dao, Vu Quynh Giao, Quang Hong Nguyen, Binh-Son Hua, Barry O'Sullivan, David Murphy, Hoang D. Nguyen
arXiv:2606. 10066v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language models (VLMs) are evaluated on public benchmarks whose images and question-answer pairs have been freely downloadable for years, yet reported accuracy assumes these examples were absent from pretraining.
By Bruce Changlong Xu, Lan Wu, Alexander Ryu
AtomCite is an agentic framework that verifies and corrects page‑level citations in multi‑page documents by parsing answers into claims, checking each claim against the cited page image, and applying a deterministic repair policy. The authors introduce DocCite, the first benchmark for this task, built on MP‑DocVQA and DUDE, containing 928 injected instances and 1,909 verified natural errors. Across Gemini, Claude, and GPT models, AtomCite achieves about 93% verification accuracy and improves citation precision from 34% to 87‑90%, while also enhancing hallucination detection in open‑source models.
By Chen Qian, Yimeng Wang, Yu Chen, Lingfei Wu, Andreas Stathopoulos