DIAG is a Diagnostic Iterative Alignment and Generation framework designed to improve data efficiency in aligning large language models for mathematical reasoning. It adaptively reshapes the practice distribution by first diagnosing valid preference-pair yield to calibrate exploration and exploitation, then generating targeted practice from the model’s failure traces. The approach is theoretically framed as a teacher‑mediated approximation to KL‑regularized reweighting, and experiments show that DIAG increases preference-pair yield and reasoning performance under the same training budget.
arXiv:2607. 10805v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for enhancing and aligning Large Language Models (LLMs).
arXiv:2605.10889v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: On-policy distillation offers dense, per-token supervision for training reasoning models; however, it remains unclear under which conditions...
The paper introduces INSPIRE, an Internalize-Then-Improve framework designed to enhance example-driven mathematical reasoning in large language models. It combines Reference-Guided Student Internalization (RGSI) to generate high-quality preference pairs with a staged rubric preference training that separates method learning from correctness. Experiments across various model sizes show consistent gains, even outperforming larger open-source models, and maintain performance on out-of-distribution mathematical tasks.
EOPSA (Efficient On-Policy Self-Distilled Safety Alignment) addresses inefficiencies in On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) for safety alignment by focusing training on safety-critical tokens. It introduces Adaptive Rollout Scheduling, which limits generation length based on a Teacher Rescue Rate metric, and Selective Distillation, which filters out safety-neutral tokens to concentrate gradient updates on safety-pivotal transitions. Experiments on models up to 32B parameters show that EOPSA reduces rollout computation by about 50% and backpropagates through only roughly 2% of tokens, outperforming full-token distillation baselines in safety compliance and reasoning retention.
The paper investigates data efficiency and selection in On‑Policy Distillation (OPD) for large language models. It shows that 1‑shot OPD—training on a single example—consistently improves performance, especially when the example is hard, and that longer chain‑of‑thought (CoT) paths drive the gains rather than token entropy. Based on these findings, the authors propose a simple hard‑example selection strategy that, using only eight carefully chosen hard examples, matches the performance of a 17,000‑example baseline across models from 1.5B to 7B parameters.
arXiv:2604. 10688v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: On-policy reinforcement learning has become the dominant paradigm for reasoning alignment in large language models, yet its sparse, outcome-level rewards make token-level credit assignment notoriously difficult.
arXiv:2609.36734v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Knowledge Distillation (KD) trains a smaller-capacity student model to imitate a larger-capacity teacher model by matching output distributions, implic...
The paper reports that in on‑policy distillation for large language models, reasoning performance can be improved by supervising only a tiny fraction of generated tokens—sometimes just one or two tokens per reasoning trajectory, about 0.05% of all tokens. This sparse supervision consistently matches or exceeds full‑token training across nine teacher‑student setups on mathematical reasoning, and is also validated on coding reasoning, Llama models, and PPO‑based reinforcement learning with verifiable reward. The findings suggest that effective post‑training does not require token‑intensive supervision and may align more closely with natural learning processes that focus on critical reasoning steps.
arXiv:2607. 28680v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Entity linking in tables matches short and ambiguous cell mentions to their corresponding knowledge-base entities.
arXiv:2605. 03677v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has recently emerged as an effective post-training paradigm for consolidating the capabilities of specialized expert models into a single student model.
The paper investigates on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD), where a student model learns from its own outputs using token‑level supervision conditioned on privileged reference information. Experiments with Qwen3 models on science and mathematics datasets show that the correct reference does not consistently improve performance; students can improve without it, and solutions from other problems sometimes outperform the correct reference. The study finds that student predictions align more closely with the base model’s reasoning than with the reference supervision, and that alignment alone does not reliably predict performance gains.
arXiv:2605. 15532v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Distillation enables compact Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to obtain strong reasoning capabilities, yet the prompts driving this process are typically chosen via simple heuristics or aggregated from off-the-shelf datasets.