arXiv:2607. 18271v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Time series forecasts are widely used in decision-critical domains, where they are rarely consumed without accompanying explanations.
By Ria Mundhra, Gustavo Sato dos Santos, Michael Benedikt
The paper introduces a synthetic ground‑truth framework for evaluating explainable AI (XAI) methods, addressing the lack of reliable evaluation procedures. By using controlled interventions to create datasets where the importance of input components is known, the framework generates ground‑truth explanations that align with the model’s actual decision process. The authors apply this approach to binary images, tabular data, and time series, and find that nine popular XAI methods exhibit significant limitations, underscoring the need for intervention‑based benchmarks.
By Miquel Mir\'o-Nicolau, Francesco Spinnato, Riccardo Guidotti
arXiv:2608. 25897v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Explaining deep learning models operating on time series data is crucial in various applications that require transparent and interpretable insights into model behavior.
By Xu Zheng, Zichuan Liu, Zhuomin Chen, Mayur Akewar, Janki Bhimani, Jason Liu, Mo Sha, Jingchao Ni, Wei Cheng, Dongsheng Luo
Explaining deep learning models operating on time series data is crucial in various applications that require transparent and interpretable insights into model behavior. {Existing explanation methods...
arXiv:2603. 13065v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning models achieve high accuracy in time series classification, yet understanding their class-level decision behaviour remains challenging.
By Ephrem Tibebe Mekonnen, Luca Longo, Lucas Rizzo, Pierpaolo Dondio
arXiv:2512. 03578v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Time series extrinsic regression (TSER) refers to the task of predicting a continuous target variable from an input time series.
By Florent Forest, Amaury Wei, Olga Fink
arXiv:2607. 14123v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Despite the proliferation of Explainable AI (XAI) techniques -- from feature attributions to sparse autoencoders -- explanations rarely influence real-world workflows.
By Michal Moshkovitz, Suraj Srinivas, Lesia Semenova, Nave Frost, Cyrus Rashtchian, Valentyn Boreiko, Shichang Zhang, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Cynthia Rudin, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan
arXiv:2607. 22045v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Counterfactual explanations are a prominent approach in explainable artificial intelligence (xAI), providing actionable guidance on what input changes would alter a model's prediction to a desired outcome.
By Oleksii Furman, {\L}ukasz Lenkiewicz, Marcel Musia{\l}ek, Maciej Zi\k{e}ba
arXiv:2511. 02152v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Time series data is one of the most popular data modalities in critical domains such as industry and medicine.
By Bart{\l}omiej Ma{\l}kus, Szymon Bobek, Grzegorz J. Nalepa
arXiv:2607. 14315v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for assessing the explainability of various XAI methods, such as LIME and SHAP, across multiple datasets and machine learning models, with the ultimate goal of creating a unified multidimensional explainability score.
By Georgios Makridis, Georgios Fatouros, Athanasios Kiourtis, Dimitrios Kotios, Vasileios Koukos, Dimosthenis Kyriazis, Jonh Soldatos
arXiv:2607. 18748v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: This paper proposes ConceptCF, a method for counterfactual generation that operates on human-interpretable concepts.
By Annemarie Jutte, Faizan Ahmed, Jeroen Linssen, Maurice van Keulen
arXiv:2606. 27599v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: While many explainable AI (XAI) methods have been proposed, most are not designed for time-series forecasting models and often rely on the implicit assumption that timestamp features are independent.
By Amadeo Tunyi