arXiv AI July 17, 2026 By Georgios Makridis, Georgios Fatouros, Athanasios Kiourtis, Dimitrios Kotios, Vasileios Koukos, Dimosthenis Kyriazis, Jonh Soldatos

Towards a Unified Multidimensional Explainability Metric: Evaluating Trustworthiness in AI Models

Read the original on arXiv AI →

arXiv:2607. 14315v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: In this paper, we present a comprehensive framework for assessing the explainability of various XAI methods, such as LIME and SHAP, across multiple datasets and machine learning models, with the ultimate goal of creating a unified multidimensional explainability score.

Summary generated by The Flow from the publisher's feed. The full article lives at arXiv AI.

arXiv AI

Aug 3

A Human-Centered Validation of the Explainability-Performance Coefficient

arXiv:2607. 29614v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The rapid adoption of deep learning models in high-risk domains has intensified the need for trustworthy Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI).

By Christian Oliva, Luis F. Lago-Fern\'andez

efficiency

arXiv Machine Learning

Jun 16

Evaluating Local Explainability Metrics for Machine Learning Models on Tabular Data

arXiv:2605. 27618v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Despite the wide use of explainability techniques to attempt to understand the behavior of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the generated explanations may not always be reliable.

By Tom\'as Pereira, Jo\~ao Vitorino, Eva Maia, Isabel Pra\c{c}a

benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 16

Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

arXiv:2607. 13045v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a key paradigm for privacy-preserving collaborative model training across distributed and heterogeneous data sources.

By Masoume Gholizade, Fabrizio Ruffini, Pietro Ducange, Francesco Marcelloni

benchmarks safety

arXiv AI

Aug 12

Rule of Thumb: Explaining Artificial Intelligence Systems using Partial Information

arXiv:2608. 10766v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) seeks to explain how an Artificial Intelligence (AI) system arrived at a particular decision.

By Kaivalya Rawal, Daria Onitiu, Brent Mittelstadt, Sandra Wachter, Chris Russell

llms

Hugging Face Trending Papers

Jun 9

Generative Explainability for Next-Generation Networks: LLM-Augmented XAI with Mutual Feature Interactions

As artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML) models become integral to network operations, their lack of transparency poses a significant barrier to operator trust. Existing explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques often fail to bridge this gap for non-specialists, producing technical outputs that are difficult to translate into actionable insights.

llms benchmarks

arXiv AI

Jul 13

All Explanations are Wrong, But Many Are Useful: Exploring the Rashomon Explanation Set with Large Language Models

arXiv:2607. 09502v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Explaining machine-learning models is increasingly important for decision-making and consumer trust, yet it is widely believed to come at a cost: existing Explainable AI (XAI) methods suffer from a persistent accuracy-explainability trade-off.

By Pan Li

llms agents benchmarks

Related stories

A Human-Centered Validation of the Explainability-Performance Coefficient

Evaluating Local Explainability Metrics for Machine Learning Models on Tabular Data

Federated Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Roles, Architectures, Evaluation, and Open Challenges

Rule of Thumb: Explaining Artificial Intelligence Systems using Partial Information

Generative Explainability for Next-Generation Networks: LLM-Augmented XAI with Mutual Feature Interactions

All Explanations are Wrong, But Many Are Useful: Exploring the Rashomon Explanation Set with Large Language Models