arXiv:2607. 12204v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Auditable memory requires a precise contract: which output is preserved, relative to which reference solve, and across which updates.
By Vishwajith Ramesh
arXiv:2608.30376v1 Announce Type: cross
Abstract: Recurrent, attention-free sequence models share a structural weakness: a fading state cannot perform exact recall of something seen once, far in the...
By George Fountzoulas
arXiv:2607. 02303v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Linear-attention and state-space language models compress the prefix into a fixed-size recurrent state, yielding O(1) memory at the cost of a lossy exact memory: when many key--value associations compete, earlier facts are overwritten and needle recall degrades.
By Wanyun Cui
arXiv:2607. 27539v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Exact deletion from persistent language-model memory depends on how that memory represents a record.
By Vishwajith Ramesh
Linear-attention and state-space language models compress the prefix into a fixed-size recurrent state, yielding O(1) memory at the cost of a lossy exact memory: when many key--value associations compete, earlier facts are overwritten and needle recall degrades. Inspired by Complementary Learning Systems, we give linear attention a hippocampal complement.
arXiv:2606. 27229v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Recurrent models must forget in order to remember, yet the state of the art decides what to erase without consulting what is stored -- the gate sees only the arriving token, not the memory it is about to modify.
By Sayak Dutta
TwinKV is a training‑free, attention‑free repair pass that identifies and swaps orphaned and redundant tokens in a KV cache, improving long‑context inference for small models. It works by detecting near‑duplicate keys and can be composed with existing eviction policies without altering their scoring rules. Experiments on Qwen3‑4B and Llama‑3.2‑1B across LongBench, LooGLE, RULER, and MMLU‑Pro show that TwinKV consistently improves performance for most configurations, especially at tighter compression ratios.
By Hong Chen, Yudong Zeng, Yongwei Huang, Zuhao Ouyang, Junyan Zhang, Xuming Hu
arXiv:2605. 07482v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Machine unlearning for large language models (LLMs) aims to selectively remove memorized content such as private data, copyrighted text, or hazardous knowledge, without costly full retraining.
By Zizhao Hu, Ameya Godbole, Johnny Tian-Zheng Wei, Mohammad Rostami, Jesse Thomason, Robin Jia
arXiv:2607. 09889v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Fixed-state sequence models compress an unbounded past into a bounded state, which caps their associative recall at roughly the state dimension; attention escapes the cap by keeping a key-value entry for every token, at quadratic compute and a cache that grows with the sequence.
By Siddharth Pal, Viktoria Rojkova
arXiv:2606. 03808v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We propose PURGE, a machine unlearning algorithm built on a simple but an under-exploited observation: continual learning (CL) and machine unlearning (MU) which are fundamentally dual problems.
By Vedant Jawandhia, Daksh Ahuja, Ghufran Alam Siddiqui, Prashant Trivedi, Yash Sinha, Pratik Narang
arXiv:2607. 27539v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Exact deletion from persistent language-model memory depends on whether a record's effect remains addressable after later computation.
By Vishwajith Ramesh
arXiv:2603. 06642v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Test-Time Training (TTT) language models replace the KV-cache with fast weights updated during inference, achieving O(1) memory but suffering catastrophic failure on exact-recall tasks.
By Swamynathan V P