The paper introduces BASSE, a multilingual meta‑evaluation dataset containing 2,040 human‑rated abstractive summaries produced manually or by five LLMs with four prompts. Annotators scored each summary on coherence, consistency, fluency, relevance, and 5W1H using a 5‑point Likert scale. Benchmarking shows proprietary LLM‑judge models best align with human judgments, followed by criteria‑specific automatic metrics, while open‑source judge LLMs perform poorly.
By Jeremy Barnes, Naiara Perez, Alba Bonet-Jover, Bego\~na Altuna
arXiv:2606. 08000v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The progress of large language models (LLMs) has fueled claims that model-generated summaries rival or even surpass human-written references, raising questions about whether summarization remains an open research problem.
By Dongqi Liu, Chenxi Whitehouse, Zheng Zhao, Zhuchen Cao, Jian Li, Yabiao Wang
arXiv:2606. 05494v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automatic text summarization has become increasingly important due to the rapid growth of digital textual information.
By Ahmed Alansary, Ali Hamdi
arXiv:2607. 15829v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Automated essay scoring (AES) enables scalable assessment and timely feedback but remains challenged by transformer input-length limitations, which can cause information loss when processing long essays.
By Haowei Hua
arXiv:2606. 05494v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Automatic text summarization has become increasingly important due to the rapid growth of digital textual information.
By Ahmed Alansary, Ali Hamdi
arXiv:2609.22603v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Summarization ships in countless production systems, making model selection a routine decision that depends on measuring summary quality. Existing metr...
By Nikhil Reddy Pottanigari, Ramin Fahimi, Noah Bolger, Sepideh Kharaghani, Ying Zhang
arXiv:2606. 23989v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: End-to-end large language models (LLMs) produce fluent multi-document summaries but remain prone to hallucination, and the attributions they offer are typically coarse (whole documents or passages) and generated post hoc, leaving each summary statement hard to verify.
By Shuo Guan
The paper introduces CARPAS, a new task that dynamically refines user-provided aspects for aspect-based summarization in large language models (LLMs). It presents three new datasets and evaluates four prompting strategies, finding that LLMs tend to over-generate aspects, leading to overly long and misaligned summaries. To address this, the authors propose a two-stage framework that first generates lightweight scope guidance before aspect refinement and summarization, which improves focus, reduces over-generation, and enhances performance across all datasets.
By Yong-En Tian, Yu-Chien Tang, An-Zi Yen, Wen-Chih Peng
arXiv:2607. 10806v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Quantifying abstractiveness in generated summaries is essential for evaluating summarization models beyond surface-level metrics like ROUGE.
By Praveenkumar Katwe, Rakesh Chandra Balabantaray, Kali Prasad Vittala
The paper "Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Education" argues that existing LLM‑generated text detectors assume a binary human/LLM distinction, which fails to capture realistic student‑AI collaboration. It introduces a contribution‑aware evaluation framework with eight student contribution levels and presents GEDE, a benchmark of over 900 human‑written and 12,500 generated essays across 886 tasks. Using GEDE, the authors evaluate four detection methods and find that most detectors perform poorly on intermediate contribution levels, especially LLM‑assisted revisions, raising concerns about false accusations.
By Lukas Gehring, Benjamin Paa{\ss}en
arXiv:2608. 03655v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Abstractive summarization models remain vulnerable to factual inconsistency, redundancy, and weak length control.
By Zeyu Wang, Guanghua Wang, Meng Xu
arXiv:2608. 04307v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Text summarization is deceptively difficult.
By Karen Lee, Dhanashree Balaram, Seojun Shon, Umair Rasheed