arXiv Computation and Language

Pluralistic Alignment in Large Language Models: Objectives, Human References, and Preference Representations

The paper introduces a two‑layer taxonomy for pluralistic alignment in large language models, distinguishing between Overton, Steerable, and Distributional pluralism and between aggregate, regional, and subgroup human references. It reviews 70 related works, finding most focus on Steerable and Distributional pluralism, with limited Overton pluralism at the aggregate level. The authors also outline evidence types—perspective validity, conditional fidelity, distributional fidelity, support preservation, and uncertainty in subgroup estimates—to evaluate these objectives.

arXiv AI
Sep 30

Population Fidelity: Evaluating Population Representativeness in LLMs

The paper introduces Population Fidelity, an evaluation framework for assessing how well large language models (LLMs) represent human population attitudes. It focuses on three dimensions: group-level accuracy, between-group variation, and the structure of that variation. Using the framework, the authors replicate a prior study on machine bias and test cultural fine-tuning, finding that while fine-tuning improves overall alignment, it does not enhance representation of within-population differences.

By Neemias B. da Silva, Martin Lukk, Ali Sutani, Abhishek Moturu, Harris Yang, Daniel Silver, Matt Ratto, Thiago H. Silva
arXiv AI
Oct 1

Demographic Pluralism: Inference-Time Modeling of Pluralistic Human Preference Distributions

The paper introduces Demographic Pluralism, an inference-time framework that estimates population-level opinion distributions without requiring training data or task-specific fine-tuning. It generates multiple perspectives within demographically grounded groups and, across four model backbones on GlobalOpinionQA and VITAL, reduces Jensen-Shannon distance by 8.4%–26.4% compared to Modular Pluralism. The study finds that equal weighting of group perspectives yields the best overall performance, while weighted aggregation performs worse due to increased group-level error.

By Meng-Chen Wu, Qipin Chen, Ansh Jain, Tess Wood, Zhe Du, Si-Chi Chin
arXiv AI
Jun 10

Hidden Consensus:Preference-Validity Compression in Human Feedback

arXiv:2606. 10569v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Standard RLHF pipelines often reduce heterogeneous human judgments into a single scalar reward target.

By Dorcas Chia Ern Chua, Karen Myn Hui Lee, Jia Yue Tan, Zhen Xue Gue, Norzalena Abdul Hamid, Azima Binti Azmi, Keat Mei Yeong, Aizat Izyani binti Mujab, Hafsah Noor Azam, Chee Guo Khoo, Han Ying Lim, Chee Seng Chan
Hugging Face Trending Papers
Jul 9

PLURAL: A Global Dataset for Value Alignment

Large language models (LLMs) are used worldwide, yet disproportionately reflect Western values, limiting their ability to represent diverse value systems. We introduce PLURAL, a large-scale, value-focused preference dataset grounded in the Integrated Values Survey (IVS), a nationally representative survey spanning 92 countries.

arXiv Computation and Language
Sep 1

Different Demographic Cues Yield Inconsistent Conclusions About LLM Personalization and Bias

The paper examines how large language models (LLMs) respond to different demographic cues—such as names—when users seek advice, focusing on race and gender in a U.S. context. It finds that using different cues for the same group leads to only partially overlapping changes in model responses, producing inconsistent conclusions about personalization and unstable bias metrics. The authors argue that LLMs react to linguistic signals tied to cues rather than to stable demographic categories, and they call for evaluations that use multiple cues and consider underlying mechanisms.

By Manuel Tonneau, Neil K. R. Sehgal, Niyati Malhotra, Sharif Kazemi, Victor Orozco-Olvera, Ana Mar\'ia Mu\~noz Boudet, Lakshmi Subramanian, Samuel P. Fraiberger, Sharath Chandra Guntuku, Valentin Hofmann