arXiv:2606. 27354v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Neural surrogate models offer fast approximate mappings from PDE parameters to solutions, but they typically treat solving as a purely statistical task: once trained, they struggle to correct their own constraint violations and extrapolate beyond the training distribution.
By Haina Jiang, Liam Wang, Peng-Chen Chen, Min Seop Kwak, Seungryong Kim, Brian Bell, Jeong Joon Park
arXiv:2602. 06842v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep learning-based hybrid iterative methods (DL-HIMs) integrate classical numerical solvers with neural operators, utilizing their complementary spectral biases to accelerate convergence.
By Yuhan Wu, Jan Willem van Beek, Victorita Dolean, Alexander Heinlein
The paper introduces a budgeted adaptive neural‑operator framework for solving time‑dependent PDEs, combining a global Fourier neural operator with a local patch‑wise residual corrector and a set‑aware selector that decides where to refine. A macro policy governs the timing and amount of refinement, and the authors propose rollout‑verified policy improvement (RV‑PI) to evaluate feasible refinement counts via actual rollouts, converting long‑horizon advantages into conservative policy targets and accepting updates only when held‑out trajectory error improves. Experiments on shallow‑water and Brusselator benchmarks show that RV‑PI outperforms immediate‑only and random macro policies, demonstrating that the value of a local correction depends on its downstream effect rather than just its immediate error reduction.
By Ange Tong
arXiv:2509. 08765v4 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Data-driven acceleration of scientific computing workflows has been a high-profile aim of machine learning (ML) for science, with numerical simulation of transient partial differential equations (PDEs) being one of the main applications.
By Mikhail Khodak, Min Ki Jung, Brian Wynne, Edmond Chow, Egemen Kolemen
The paper investigates how different attention mechanisms affect the performance of DeepONet neural operators. Five variants—varying in cross‑attention, self‑attention, tokenization, and attention depth—are trained in both data‑driven and physics‑informed settings on one‑ and two‑dimensional PDE benchmarks. Results show that per‑sensor tokenization with cross‑attention consistently reduces error, while branch self‑attention helps only in complex spatial problems, and deeper cross‑attention yields diminishing returns with higher cost.
By Amar Alem Koric, Qibang Liu, Seid Koric
arXiv:2604. 07366v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) govern nearly every physical process in science and engineering, but solving them at scale remains prohibitively expensive.
By Yilong Dai, Shengyu Chen, Xiaowei Jia, Runlong Yu