arXiv:2608.21925v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Emotional Support Conversation (ESC) systems aim to provide holistic support by balancing professional therapeutic competence with natural empathy. How...
By Weichu Liu, Yuxuan Hu, Yirong Sun, Ningning Mao, Ziyun Zhang, Jian Chen, Mingyang Xu, Qishan Zhong, Chengming Li
arXiv:2508. 09521v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Emotional support conversations require more than fluent responses.
By Yunxiao Wang, Meng Liu, Sicheng Zhao, Lizi Liao, Liqiang Nie
arXiv:2606. 15532v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Emotional intelligence (EI) in Large Language Models (LLMs) is often evaluated through static understanding tasks or single-response dialogue generation.
By Rongzhi Zhu, Xiang Huang, Yuchuan Wu, Rui Wang, Zequn Sun, Tao Ren, Weiyao Luo, Bingxue Qiu, Jieping Ye, Yongbin Li, Wei Hu
arXiv:2603. 06194v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) has shown strong performance in single-turn tasks, but extending it to multi-turn interaction remains challenging due to sparse rewards and poor per-turn credit assignment.
By Naifan Zhang, Ruihan Sun, Jinwei Su, Hengjie Yang, Zhengyuan Pan, Zhaohan Chen, Xiaofan Zhang
EmoReward is a self‑evolving reward calibration framework for emotional video generation using reinforcement learning. It distills reliability from reward traces during training to adaptively weight multiple reward primitives—such as visual quality, motion, and text alignment—based on emotional evidence. The method employs grounding cues, heterogeneous signal primitives, reflective reward gating, and a RewardMemory module to calibrate fusion weights across training runs, demonstrating improvements on HunyuanVideo 1.5 and transferability to SD 3.5 and FLUX.
By Mingzhe Zheng, Yue Wu, Jing Tan, Chang Zou, Dengyang Jiang, Zeyue Tian, Xuanhua He, Ryan Xu, Yunyang Ge, Sihui Ji, Yunlong Lin, Kaihang Pan, Hongru Yan, Sixiang Chen, Dianyi Wang, Julian Zhang, Weijie Kong, Changlin Li, Lanqing Guo, Zhao Zhong, Qifeng Chen, Harry Yang
EvoRubric introduces a co‑evolutionary reinforcement learning framework that learns rubric‑driven evaluation criteria for open‑ended text generation. The system uses a shared policy that simultaneously generates responses and rubrics, while a frozen meta‑verifier and grader provide validity checks and scoring. Experiments on medical, writing, and science benchmarks show that EvoRubric outperforms static and other evolving‑rubric baselines, achieving higher average scores on five tasks.
By Xin Guan, Xiaomeng Hu, Shen Huang, Zhenyi Wang, Bo Zhang, Zijian Li, Pengjun Xie, Bo Liu, Jiuxin Cao
Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has advanced generative model post-training in verifiable domains such as code and mathematics, but evaluating video quality, especially emotional expression,...
arXiv:2608.30005v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Rubric-based reinforcement learning extends RL beyond tasks with exact answers or rule-based verifiers by scoring responses against instance-specific c...
By Fengyu Xie, Yilun Zhao, Bingsen Chen, Arman Cohan, Chen Zhao
arXiv:2609.00892v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Rubric-based reinforcement learning decomposes open-ended instructions into prompt-specific, flexible rubrics, making it better suited than reinforceme...
By Siyuan Li, Xinxin Song, Chen Ruinian, Jingjing Fan, Tingxiong Xiao, Yangen Hu, Ke Zeng, Jinli Suo
arXiv:2608. 09248v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Skill-based LLM agents select reusable procedures from an external library to solve complex tasks, yet their routing decisions rely entirely on text-level signals such as task descriptions, verbal reflections, and experience-derived rules, while the model's own internal representational state remains unobserved.
By Bohan Lin, Hejia Geng, Xinyi Xie, Heng Zhou, Qinghua Xing, Bo Liu, Chen Zhang, Yudong Zhang
arXiv:2607. 23263v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Deciding whether a trajectory actually fulfills its instruction governs how we measure computer-use agents on long-horizon graphical-user-interface tasks and how we train them with reinforcement learning.
By Yang Wan, Zhenhao Zhang, Jierui Wang, Linchao Zhu
arXiv:2606. 03980v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reward models (RMs) provide critical feedback signals for LLM post-training, notably in reinforced fine-tuning (RFT) and reinforcement learning (RL) pipelines.
By Tao Chen, Gangwei Jiang, Pengyu Cheng, Siyuan Huang, Yihao Liu, Jingwei Ni, Jiaqi Guo, Mengyu Zhou, Kai Tang, Junling Liu, Qinliang Su, Xiaoxi Jiang, Guanjun Jiang