arXiv:2607. 14233v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have had a broad research impact in modeling domains governed by partial differential equations (PDE).
By Nilay Anurag, Shital Adhikari, Taniya Kapoor, Nikhil Muralidhar
The paper presents a modified physics-informed DeepONet (PI-DeepONet) architecture that reduces computational cost by eliminating redundancy in the Branch network’s handling of input functions across collocation points. The new formulation is mathematically equivalent to the original but uses smaller input tensors and fewer network evaluations, leading to faster training while maintaining comparable predictive accuracy on 1D, 2D, and 3D linear advection problems. Experiments show up to a 3.75× speed‑up in 2D and enable feasible training of 3D models on an NVIDIA A100 GPU, where the original architecture fails due to memory limits.
By Nahum Banks, Gustavo A. M. de Almeida, Sergio Maldonado
arXiv:2605. 25001v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: While Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are powerful for solving Partial Differential Equations (PDEs), their training is often paralyzed by gradient pathology.
By Yichen Luo, Peiyu Zhu, Dongxiao Hu, Jia Wang, Tailin Wu, Dapeng Lan, Yu Liu, Zhibo Pang
arXiv:2609.07814v1 Announce Type: new
Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) struggle on PDEs whose governing physics varies across the domain. We trace this to a structural property of s...
By Hanwen Wang, Paris Perdikaris
arXiv:2607. 22215v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In this study, we introduce latent PDE mapping, a broadly applicable physics-informed learning technique designed to enable efficient geometric generalization with sparse training data.
By Ingvild Askim Adde, Mary M. Maleckar, Gabriel Balaban
The paper presents a data‑efficient pre‑training framework for neural surrogate models solving PDEs on unstructured 3D geometries. It introduces a geometry‑driven strategy for steady‑state problems that uses intrinsic shape descriptors, and a physics‑driven approach for transient problems that generates synthetic PDE data online. Experiments show faster convergence, higher data efficiency, and improved accuracy during fine‑tuning, especially in low‑data settings.
By Luis Medrano-Navarro, Giacomo Baldan, Qiang Liu, Benjamin Holzschuh, Jan Hagnberger, Mathias Niepert, Nils Thuerey
arXiv:2602. 02788v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: We aim to develop physics foundation models for science and engineering that provide real-time solutions to Partial Differential Equations (PDEs) which preserve structure and accuracy under adaptation to unseen geometries.
By Benjamin D. Shaffer, Shawn Koohy, Brooks Kinch, M. Ani Hsieh, Nathaniel Trask
arXiv:2606. 19754v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Partial differential equations (PDEs) play a central role in modeling complex physical, biological, and engineering systems.
By Zhiwen Yu, Derong Yang, Liujian Zhang, Kaixiang Yang, Peilin Zhan, Jianmin Lv, Jane You, C. L. Philip Chen
arXiv:2602.08515v3 Announce Type: replace-cross
Abstract: This work investigates shallow physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for solving forward and inverse problems governed by nonlinear partia...
By Muhammad Luthfi Shahab, Imam Mukhlash, Hadi Susanto
The paper introduces beignet, a neural field architecture that replaces the random Fourier feature embedding in physics-informed neural networks with a trainable multi‑resolution Fourier feature pyramid. By using Fourier interpolation and spectral derivatives, beignet efficiently computes spatial derivatives and scales accuracy through the feature pyramid rather than the neural network size. Experiments show that beignet achieves more accurate PDE solutions with fewer parameters than existing PINN methods and can reach machine‑precision residuals on the inviscid Burgers blowup problem using the Adam optimizer.
By Brandon Zhao, Yixuan Wang, Jonathan T. Barron, Katherine L. Bouman, Dor Verbin, Pratul P. Srinivasan
arXiv:2607. 08025v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While neural PDE solvers have demonstrated significant potential for accelerating engineering simulations, existing architectures remain constrained by high memory consumption and the single node bottleneck, where the maximum processable mesh resolution is strictly limited by the VRAM of a single compute unit.
By Weiheng Zhong, Jing Bi, Victor Oancea, Hadi Meidani
The paper introduces the simultaneous neural topology optimization (SNTO) framework, which uses custom neural networks to jointly represent state, adjoint, and design variables in a single optimization loop. SNTO incorporates a multi-component loss function that balances design objectives, aggregated stress constraints, and potential energy, and employs a hardware‑aware training scheme that partitions the design domain across multiple GPUs to handle millions of degrees of freedom. Validation on 2D benchmarks shows super‑resolution designs with sharper boundaries and lower volume fractions, while large‑scale 3D tests demonstrate scalability to eight million collocation points on eight GPUs.
By Xiangyu Sun, Shirin Hosseinmardi, Ramin Bostanabad