Activation-Conditioned Self-Distillation
Read the original on arXiv Machine Learning →The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The Flow has not summarised this story yet — read it at arXiv Machine Learning.
The paper introduces On-Policy Attention Self-Distillation (OPASD), a method that augments token-level supervision with solution-conditioned attention distillation for reasoning models. OPASD projects a privileged teacher’s attention onto student-visible positions, renormalizes the distribution, and aligns it with the student. Experiments on three model sizes and four math benchmarks show that OPASD improves accuracy by 4.98–8.40 percentage points, reduces generated tokens by 73.9%, cuts compute by 72.6%, and trains 1.53× faster compared to token-only distillation.
arXiv:2605.10194v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) uses a model as its own teacher under privileged context, providing token-level supervision on the model's own r...
The paper introduces a recursive self-improvement framework for language models that replaces an external teacher with a frozen copy of the student, enabling dynamic co-evolution (DCE) and self-refined concise learning (SRCL). DCE allows the privileged teacher to evolve alongside the student, while SRCL trains on shorter, verified rewrites to reduce verbosity. Experiments show that the combined DCE+SRCL approach outperforms traditional on‑policy self‑distillation across multiple model sizes and math benchmarks, achieving significant accuracy gains and shorter outputs.
arXiv:2605.10889v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: On-policy distillation offers dense, per-token supervision for training reasoning models; however, it remains unclear under which conditions...
The paper investigates on‑policy self‑distillation (OPSD), where a student model learns from its own outputs using token‑level supervision conditioned on privileged reference information. Experiments with Qwen3 models on science and mathematics datasets show that the correct reference does not consistently improve performance; students can improve without it, and solutions from other problems sometimes outperform the correct reference. The study finds that student predictions align more closely with the base model’s reasoning than with the reference supervision, and that alignment alone does not reliably predict performance gains.
arXiv:2607. 18955v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has substantially improved the reasoning capabilities of large language models on tasks such as mathematical reasoning and code generation.