arXiv:2606. 06014v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Latent world models (LWMs) have strengthened end-to-end autonomous driving by forecasting compact scene dynamics for downstream planning.
By Xiaoyun Qiu, Jingtao He, Yijie Chen, Yusong Huang, Haotian Wang, Yixuan Wang, Xinhu Zheng
The paper presents a comparative study of motion planning methods from major autonomous driving benchmarks—CARLA, nuPlan, and the Waymo Open Dataset—using CARLA Leaderboard v2.1 as a unified evaluation platform. Eight representative planners (TF++, InterFuser, TCP, PDM‑Lite, MTR+MPC, CaRL, PlanT 2.0, Diffusion planner) are evaluated to highlight their strengths, weaknesses, prevailing trends, and common challenges in motion planning research.
By Merve Atasever, Alfredo Reina Corona, Zhuochen Liu, Qingpei Li, Akshay Hitendra Shah, Hans Walker, Jyotirmoy V. Deshmukh, Rahul Jain
arXiv:2607. 03182v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous driving planning requires translating navigation intent, traffic rules, dynamic interactions, and language instructions into executable continuous trajectories.
By Qi Liu, Yabei Li, Hongsong Wang, Heng Zhang, Lei He
DiffuSearch is a hybrid trajectory planner for autonomous driving that unifies objectives across both generation and refinement stages. It first uses a guided diffusion model to produce scene-consistent joint trajectories, then refines them with a Monte Carlo Tree Search that shares the same driving goals—collision avoidance, drivable area compliance, comfort, and progress. Experiments on nuPlan and interPlan benchmarks show that this synergy reduces collisions and improves comfort, especially in complex interactive scenarios.
By Steffen Hagedorn, Aron Distelzweig, Alexandru P. Condurache
arXiv:2607. 00283v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Autonomous vehicles must safely navigate complex environments where planning-critical agents may be hidden from view.
By Amirhosein Chahe, Tyler Naes, Jovin D'sa, Faizan M. Tariq, Sangjae Bae, Lifeng Zhou, David Isele
arXiv:2606. 31106v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Large-scale datasets and fast simulators have enabled improvements in driving policies that appear safe and robust, yet strong performance in nominal scenarios can still mask flawed reasoning and unsafe heuristics.
By Hyeonchang Jeon, Kyungbeom Kim, Eugene Vinitsky, Kyung-Joong Kim
arXiv:2606. 26661v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Motion forecasting is essential for autonomous driving systems to enable safe decision-making and planning in complex driving scenarios.
By Sangjin Han, Hoseong Jung, Jeongtae Her, Changhyun Choi, H. Jin Kim
Efficient Multi-Modal Planning with Reward-Guided Preference Optimization for Autonomous Driving proposes EMPlan, a hybrid trajectory planning method that combines sparse anchors with an offset refinement module for low-latency, high-accuracy predictions. The approach uses a two-stage training paradigm—pretraining followed by reward-guided fine-tuning—to improve safety without extra inference cost, leveraging rule-based reward signals and unpaired preference supervision. EMPlan is evaluated on the non-reactive NAVSIM benchmark, achieving a favorable balance between planning accuracy and efficiency under real-time constraints.
By Chenglin Chen, Lujia Wang, Xinhu Zheng, Jun Ma, Haoang Li
arXiv:2608. 03521v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Forecasting precise future motion of surrounding agents is essential for reliable autonomous vehicles.
By Xiucong Zhao, Jindong Tian, Hao Miao
arXiv:2606. 00857v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Accurate and reliable vehicle trajectory prediction is essential for safe autonomous driving.
By Xinyi Ning, Zilin Bian, Dachuan Zuo, Semiha Ergan, Kaan Ozbay
CAR‑VLA is a Vision‑Language‑Action model for autonomous driving that jointly considers scene complexity and dynamic risk to determine reasoning depth, urgency, and focus. It maps four complexity‑risk categories to three reasoning modes—Fast Intuition, Slow Thinking, and Reflex Response—each tailored to different driving scenarios. The model is trained via progressive supervised learning and reinforcement learning, achieving competitive performance on NAVSIM and Navhard benchmarks and demonstrating risk‑aware reasoning in high‑risk scenarios.
By Xiaolei Chen, Zhuolin He, Yuxuan Liang, Xu Li, Haotian Chen, Fan Shi, Mengyang Zhao, Wenjuan Meng, Zisheng Chen, Zhihao Zhu, Zhounan Jin, Hengli Wang, Qingfan Wang, Jiamei Liang, Bin Li, Xiangyang Xue
Motion forecasting is essential for autonomous driving systems to enable safe decision-making and planning in complex driving scenarios. While existing predictors excel at minimizing standard displacement errors, they often overlook the adherence to lane topology of multimodal predictions, particularly for lower-probability modes.