arXiv:2604. 05635v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Numerical preprocessing remains a critical component of tabular deep learning, as the representation of continuous features can strongly affect downstream performance.
By Manish Kumar, Anton Frederik Thielmann, Christoph Weisser, Benjamin S\"afken
arXiv:2606. 02384v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Progress in tabular machine learning has largely focused on increasingly sophisticated model architectures.
By Andrej Tschalzev, Nick Erickson, Yuyang Wang, Huzefa Rangwala, Stefan L\"udtke, Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Christian Bartelt
arXiv:2608. 03557v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular-to-image methods that convert tabular data into visual representations have emerged as a novel paradigm for leveraging the high performance of deep learning models.
By Malena Loza, Felipe Grijalva, Eva Milara, Luis Bote-Curiel, Francisco J. Lara-Abelenda, David Chushig-Muzo
arXiv:2606. 30410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models for predictive machine learning on tabular data have recently gained significant traction in academia and industry.
By Lennart Purucker, Andrej Tschalzev, Nick Erickson, Gioia Blayer, David Holzm\"uller, Alan Arazi, Alexander Pfefferle, Mustafa Tajjar, Ga\"el Varoquaux, Frank Hutter
arXiv:2607. 10077v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular learning is still dominated by gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs), while recent deep learning approaches have become increasingly competitive.
By Jiaqi Luo, Shixin Xu
arXiv:2607. 06151v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Generalization remains a pivotal challenge in deep learning, where traditional optimizers like Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) often converge to sharp minima, leading to overfitting and reduced performance on unseen data.
By Yao Fu, Chunxia Zhang, Junmin Liu, Yihang Jin, Haishan Ye, Yuanao Yang
arXiv:2608. 18026v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Large-scale, high-dimensional tabular regression remains challenging: tree-based models are robust but lack end-to-end representation learning, while deep models enable flexible feature learning but often incur costly interaction modeling and sensitivity to noisy or redundant features.
By Ali Eslamian, Qiang Cheng
arXiv:2511. 15941v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Tabular data underpins decisions across science, industry, and public services.
By David Bonet, Mar\c{c}al Comajoan Cara, Alvaro Calafell, Daniel Mas Montserrat, Alexander G. Ioannidis
arXiv:2606. 19827v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical tabular data are ubiquitous in clinical research, but deep learning for tables remains underexplored because reliable labels often require costly expert adjudication, even though structured clinical variables are routinely available in tabular form.
By Daehwan Kim, Haejun Chung, Ikbeom Jang
arXiv:2605. 18629v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are one of the main methods to interpret the inner workings of deep neural networks (DNNs), decomposing activations into higher-dimensional features.
By Micha{\l} Brzozowski, Neo Christopher Chung
arXiv:2603. 10823v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Deep generative models can help with data scarcity and privacy by producing synthetic training data, but they struggle in low-data, imbalanced tabular settings to fully learn the complex data distribution.
By Xiaofeng Lin, Seungbae Kim, Zhuoya Li, Zachary DeSoto, Charles Fleming, Guang Cheng
arXiv:2606. 05139v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The rapid advancement of high-throughput sequencing has led to large, high-dimensional omics datasets.
By Luca Thale-Bombien, Jan Ewald, Ralf K\"onig, Aaron Klein