arXiv Machine Learning

TabLoRA: Parameter-Efficient Low-Rank Ensemble Learning for Large-Scale Tabular Data

arXiv:2607. 10077v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Tabular learning is still dominated by gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs), while recent deep learning approaches have become increasingly competitive.

arXiv Machine Learning
Sep 17

TabICLv2: A better, faster, scalable, and open tabular foundation model

TabICLv2 is a new state‑of‑the‑art tabular foundation model that outperforms existing methods on regression and classification tasks. It relies on a synthetic data generation engine for diverse pretraining, architectural innovations such as a scalable softmax attention, and optimized training protocols that replace AdamW with the Muon optimizer. On the TabArena and TALENT benchmarks, TabICLv2 surpasses the current best model, RealTabPFN‑2.5, without any tuning, while also being faster and capable of handling million‑scale datasets with limited GPU memory.

By Jingang Qu, David Holzm\"uller, Ga\"el Varoquaux, Marine Le Morvan
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 19

TabNSM: Neural Sparse Mixer for Tabular Regression

TabNSM is a scalable regression framework for large-scale, high-dimensional tabular data that builds on sparse-attention and mixer architectures. Its core component, the Adaptive Sparse Interaction Module (ASIM), combines foreground feature discovery, sparse local interaction encoding, and Feature-Token Mixing to achieve near-linear complexity. For regression, TabNSM adds a Multi-Stage Regression Head, GridLoss (an ordinal-aware soft-binning objective), and RISE (a difficulty-aware sampling strategy), achieving strong predictive performance and practical scalability across nine real-world benchmarks, especially on high-dimensional and heterogeneous datasets.

By Ali Eslamian, Qiang Cheng
arXiv AI
Jun 30

Beyond IID: How General Are Tabular Foundation Models, Really?

arXiv:2606. 30410v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Foundation models for predictive machine learning on tabular data have recently gained significant traction in academia and industry.

By Lennart Purucker, Andrej Tschalzev, Nick Erickson, Gioia Blayer, David Holzm\"uller, Alan Arazi, Alexander Pfefferle, Mustafa Tajjar, Ga\"el Varoquaux, Frank Hutter
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 14

TabH2O: A Unified Foundation Model for Tabular Prediction

arXiv:2605. 18383v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We present TabH2O, a foundation model for tabular data that performs classification and regression in a single forward pass via in-context learning.

By Pascal Pfeiffer, Dmitry Gordeev, Mathias M\"uller, Laura Fink, Joan Salv\`a Soler, Mark Landry, Branden Murray, Marcos V. Conde, Sri Satish Ambati
arXiv AI
Sep 4

Xiaomi-TabLDM: A Tabular Foundation Model Technical Report

Xiaomi-TabLDM is a tabular foundation model that performs classification and regression via in-context learning without task‑specific fine‑tuning. It is pretrained solely on synthetic data from structural causal models, achieving top‑ranked regression results on multiple benchmarks while reducing training and prediction time compared to leading models. The architecture incorporates a three‑stage training strategy, dual‑stream feature grouping, lightweight attention residuals, and sparse mixture‑of‑experts, and it can further improve accuracy through test‑time compute scaling.

By TabLDM Team, Penghui Wang, Wei Liu, Hong Wang, Chengyue Huang, Yuxi Sun, Zirui Wang, Hongming Huang, Quan Wang, Chunxiao Liu, Erli Meng, Bin Wang
arXiv AI
Aug 11

Tabular Numeric Stretch Transformation

arXiv:2608. 09162v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Tabular data presents unique challenges for deep learning due to its heterogeneous nature, where numeric features exhibit diverse distributions, scales, and statistical properties.

By Zihao Ye, Juyong Kim, Johnna Sundberg, Burak Varici, Pradeep Ravikumar
arXiv AI
4d ago

LoopICL: Looping a single transformer block to solve tabular tasks

LoopICL is a transformer architecture that loops a single block to address tabular tasks. It separates parameter count from computational depth by using a cell stream for per‑cell features and a row stream for in‑context examples, refined via within‑column and cross‑column attention. During pre‑training, varying loop counts and a learned exit‑gate allow the model to adjust inference depth at test time, achieving competitive performance with TabICLv2 while using about 90% fewer parameters.

By Amir Rezaei Balef, Katharina Eggensperger
arXiv Machine Learning
Aug 21

Table2Image: Lightweight Tabular Learning with Generated Proxy Representations and Reliability Diagnostics

arXiv:2412. 06265v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Deep tabular models should ideally balance predictive performance, parameter efficiency, and robustness to imperfect learning signals---properties that are rarely considered jointly.

By Seungeun Lee, Kihwan Lee, Subin Bae, Sangjun Lee, Seulbin Lee, Julia Stoyanovich, Il-Youp Kwak, Seungsang Oh